ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025
No-Shows in a Tertiary Care Pediatric Otolaryngology Clinic: Predictors and Impact on Provider Productivity.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Patient-reported reasons for missed otolaryngology outpatient appointments].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: No-show appointments (NS) lead to a mismatch between supply and expected demand, operational inefficiency, decreased access to care, and economic deficit. We evaluated the predictors and impact of NS on provider productivity in a tertiary pediatric otolaryngology clinic. Methods: Patients who had a pediatric otolaryngology clinic appointment were identified. Demographics, type of appointment and clinic visit, provider, insurance, appointment lead time, time of the appointment, caregiver income, distance to the clinic, and season of the year were analyzed. Predictors of NS and loss of providers' work-RVUs and revenue were assessed. NS and non-NS populations were compared using Results: Of 24,593 appointments, 10,392 (42%) were female, (age median = 5 years) and of the 4627 NS 2016 (44%) were female, (age median = 5 years). Logistic regression identified male (OR: 0.093, 95% CI [0.88-0.99], Conclusions: No-show appointments led to a substantial loss of provider productivity and revenue. Of the multiple demographic and clinic visit determinants associated with high NS rates, appointment lead time can be tested in future studies of strategies to reduce NS. Level of Evidence: 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.