Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925605›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Jigsaw-Based Learning in Medical Education: Students' Perceptions and Feedback.

Archana Nimesh, Gitanjali Goyal, Ramnika Aggarwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Archana NimeshDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Bathinda, IND.
Gitanjali GoyalDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Bathinda, IND.
Ramnika AggarwalDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Bathinda, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The medical education system periodically revises the teaching-learning strategies. Medical students find it difficult to cope with pre-clinical subjects due to limited patient exposure and traditional didactic lectures. This study introduced a jigsaw method for revising biochemistry topics and assessed first-year medical students' perceptions and feedback on its effectiveness and implementation in medical education. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study enrolled 80 students for a jigsaw exercise on the topic "carbohydrate chemistry." Students were divided into four groups guided by a moderator. Further subgroups were created in each group, and each student was assigned a subtopic in "carbohydrate chemistry." Students with common subtopics were regrouped to self-study the provided study material. Students then reassembled in their original subgroups to teach their respective subtopics to their peers. Thus, it enables all students of a subgroup to learn all subtopics of the main topic in a short time as an interactive team. In the end, students filled out a feedback form providing their opinion about the effectiveness of the exercise. Results Out of 80 students, 71 responded to the survey, yielding an 88.75% response rate. Most students opined that the jigsaw exercise enhanced their understanding (N = 59, 83.1%), clarified concepts (N = 54, 76.1%), improved retention (N = 55, 77.5%), and communication skills (N = 59, 83.1%) and that it is a good method to revise topics (N = 58, 81.7%). Most supported its inclusion in the medical curriculum (N = 56, 78.9%) and recommended frequent use (N = 49, 69%). Conclusion The jigsaw exercise seems promising for improving students' understanding, clearing doubts, enhancing retention and communication skills, and fast revision. The authors recommend its inclusion in the curriculum to facilitate self-directed active learning.

Indexed as

biochemistryfeedbackjigsawmedical educationperceptionsretentionrevisionself-directed learningstudents

Identifiers

PMID39925605
PMCPMC11807236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.