ReviewCureus2025
From Primary Care to Super Specialty: A Comparison of Workforce Expansion and Capacity Building in Internal Medicine in India and the United States.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Family medicine in India: Where are we now?Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Medical Residency Admissions in India and the United States: A Comparative Analysis of Challenges and Reforms.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internal medicine (IM), a cornerstone of healthcare, focuses on diagnosing, treating, and preventing adult diseases. This review explores the training pathways and opportunities in IM in India and the United States (USA), highlighting critical disparities in postgraduate medical education. A combination of statistical analysis, literature review, and policy evaluation was utilized. Data were compiled from government databases, academic literature, and organizational reports to identify the number of postgraduate seats and training opportunities. Comparative metrics, such as per capita seat availability and training ratios, were analyzed to highlight disparities. In India, IM residencies, offered as Doctor of Medicine (MD) or Diplomate of National Board (DNB) programs, account for only a small proportion of postgraduate seats, with significant variations in per capita availability compared to the USA. While the number of undergraduate medical seats in India has grown substantially, postgraduate training opportunities, especially in IM and its subspecialties, remain limited. This discrepancy contributes to a shortage of internists and specialists, particularly in rural and underserved regions, impacting healthcare delivery. The USA offers a more robust IM training framework, with higher per capita residency and fellowship positions, ensuring a more comprehensive distribution of specialists. In contrast, India's lower per capita availability of IM seats has led to an imbalance in the doctor-to-patient ratio and prompted many Indian medical graduates to seek training abroad, resulting in a "brain drain." Addressing this disparity requires a systemic approach, including increasing postgraduate and superspecialty seats, adopting innovative training models, and aligning India's medical education system with global standards. Expanding training capacity, particularly in underserved regions, and transitioning to a residency-based model for certain specialties could improve healthcare outcomes and bridge the gap in IM expertise between India and developed nations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.