Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925558›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Postoperative Compliance With Follow-Up Among Photorefractive Keratectomy Patients in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Alanoud A Alfaqih, Shaden D AlShammari, Noora A Juaythin, Sarah H Aljefri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alanoud A AlfaqihCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, SAU.
Shaden D AlShammariCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, SAU.
Noora A JuaythinCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, SAU.
Sarah H AljefriOphthalmology, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Refractive error is a condition that results when the eye fails to concentrate light rays from objects onto the retinal plane, resulting in blurry images. And it accounts for about 47% of all cases of vision impairment in high-income and developed countries. Methods This retrospective observational study was conducted among patients who underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) Medical Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected from patients aged 18 years or older with a stable refractive error and normal corneal topography. Data were tabulated in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results A total of two hundred patients who underwent PRK were analyzed (male 44.5% {89} vs female 55.5% {111}). The most common age group was 18 to 30 years (81.5%, 163). The recommended four follow-ups post photorefractive keratectomy were recorded, and 100% (200) were in compliance with the first follow-up. In univariate analysis, increasing age and being an employee were the factors influencing compliance to follow-up. However, in multivariate regression analysis, being employed was the only significant independent predictor associated with follow-up compliance. Being not informed and busy schedules were recognized as the most important barriers to follow-up compliance. Conclusion Compliance with follow-up visits post-PRK was less than desired. However, employed patients may exhibit a better attitude toward follow-up visits than the rest. Hence, more efforts are required to educate patients about the importance of follow-ups, which may enhance their follow-up compliance.

Indexed as

adherenceanterior segment refractive surgerycompliancefollow-upphotorefractive keratectomy

Identifiers

PMID39925558
PMCPMC11807392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.