ArticleCureus2025
Results of Lower Limb Bone Lengthening by Using Motorized and Magnet-Driven Intramedullary Nails to Treat Limb Length Discrepancy.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic Intramedullary Lengthening Nails for Complex Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Functional Outcomes, Bone Healing, and Complications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical and radiological outcomes of magnetically controlled intramedullary lengthening nails in adolescents and young adults: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLimb length discrepancies (LLDs) can be treated with limb lengthening using external fixation or intramedullary nails, such as PRECICE or FITBONE. PRECICE is a magnetically driven titanium nail, while FITBONE is a motorized nail; both use an external remote control. This study aimed to determine the complications, compensation of length difference, time needed for compensation, and healing outcome of bone lengthening using motorized or magnet-driven intramedullary nails among non-cosmetic limb lengthening cases.
methodsThis retrospective study was derived from a single surgeon's practice at a tertiary hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Between 2009 and 2020, 15 patients with LLDs, with a mean age of 25.43 years (range 16-35 years), were identified. The study included congenital, post-traumatic, idiopathic, and acquired causes of LLDs. Outcomes were measured using complete lengthening and healing indices, which need the presence of three intact cortices out of four.
resultsAll patients achieved correction of their limb length without any device failure or nail breakage. The achieved limb length for all patients averaged 38.4 mm, ranging from 21 to 60 mm. No intraoperative complications were observed. Postoperatively, one patient reported knee stiffness, and another developed deep venous thrombosis. Duration of distraction (average 43.93 days, range 30-66 days) and the mean healing index was 32 days/cm for both the femur and tibia.
conclusionThis study confirms that intramedullary nail PRECICE 2 and FITBONE systems are reliable and effective lengthening devices for treating lower LLDs and deformities. These devices significantly reduce complications and achieve excellent outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.