ArticleCureus2025
Successful Management of Complications Due to a Cesarean Section in a Patient With a Complex Obstetric History: A Case Report and Review of Preventive Strategies.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A multiparous 37-year-old female patient (G7P3A4) with a complex obstetric history consisting of a myomectomy for uterine fibroids and a previous cesarean section (C-section) resulted in complicated intra- and postpartum events. The incidental cystotomy during the C-section was managed conservatively by catheterization. Postoperatively the patient suffered from postpartum menorrhagia and an enlarged uterus and was managed with an explorative laparotomy concluding with extensive lysis of adhesions and total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy. The patient did well postoperatively and was discharged after 48 hours. She returned for an outpatient follow-up one week later and was reassured that her pain would improve within six to eight weeks. This case study details the complications and aftermath of intense intra-abdominal adhesions and calls for a better understanding of the management of adhesions for abdominal procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.