ArticleCureus2025
Actinomyces Species As Emerging Pathogens: An Observational Study of Clinical Infections and Microbiological Implications.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of the identified genus of anaerobic bacteria in bloodstream infection beyond host-related risk factors: a five-year retrospective cohort study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Endobronchial Actinomycosis - The Great Masquerader.Annals of African medicine · 2026Article
- Natural and synthetic antimicrobial peptides against anaerobic bacteria: A review of activities and mechanisms of action.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Case Report: Fournier's gangrene caused byFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: Disseminated actinomycosis-induced splenic rupture with spleen and liver abscesses.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction
aimWe evaluated the pattern, presentation, and risk factors for MATERIAL AND
methodsBlood culture, tissue, fluids, bone, and swab samples with isolated
resultsA total of 145 patients were evaluated, comprising 63 males and 82 females; the mean age was 49 years. About 52.4% and 59.3% of comorbidities and risk factors for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.