ReviewGlobal medical genetics2025
Genetic impact of copy number variations on congenital heart defects: Current insights and future directions.
Review in Global medical genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are the most prevalent congenital abnormalities, and they are commonly associated with genetic alterations, namely copy number variants. CNVs, which are duplications or deletions of DNA sequences, can disrupt gene regulation, impact dosage-sensitive genes, and cause loss-of-function mutations, all of which can interfere with heart development. CNVs cause genomic instability by changing essential genes, which plays an important role in the pathophysiology of CHDs. Detecting these variants is critical for better understanding the genetic causes of these abnormalities and improving patient outcomes. Advanced genetic testing tools aid in detecting CNVs linked to CHDs. Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), High-throughput Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (HLPA), Whole Exome Sequencing (WES), Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA), and CNV-specific sequencing (CNV-seq) have all greatly improved the detection of these variants. Furthermore, whole genome sequencing (WGS) has emerged as a potent method for detecting CNVs on a wide scale, allowing for earlier diagnosis and more effective treatment planning. Therefore, this review focuses on the rising significance of CNV research in congenital heart defects, emphasizing on how genetic differences might lead to improved diagnostic and treatment options. By combining genomic technologies, researchers and clinicians can gain a better understanding of the function of CNVs in CHDs, opening the door for personalised therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.