Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925409›Full record

ArticleUCL open. Environment2025

Miniaturisation of the

Eberhard Küster, George Gyan Addo, Silke Aulhorn, Dana Kühnel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in UCL open. Environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eberhard KüsterDepartment Ecotoxicology (former Department Bioanalytical Ecotoxicology), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6062-2755
George Gyan AddoDepartment Ecotoxicology (former Department Bioanalytical Ecotoxicology), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Silke AulhornDepartment Ecotoxicology (former Department Bioanalytical Ecotoxicology), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Dana KühnelDepartment Ecotoxicology (former Department Bioanalytical Ecotoxicology), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1712-6278

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International standard test guidelines for the ecotoxicological characterisation of various substances use organisms such as algae, daphnids and fish embryos. These guidelines recommend or use relatively high volumes of water for the process of testing, for example, 200 mL for a complete dose-response relationship in a daphnia assay. However, for various samples such as concentrated extracts from environmental monitoring or leachates from microplastic ageing experiments, the amount of available sample volume is limited, that is, rather in the range of 10-50 mL/biotest. Using the exposure volumes as recommended in test guidelines would not allow to test a range of different concentrations or to repeat tests or use multiple different organismic bioassays. Lower media volumes would allow the testing of more samples (more concentrations per sample, more test repetitions for statistical robustness, etc.) but it may also decrease the possible number of organisms tested in the same volume. Here, we aimed at reducing the test volumes in the acute daphnia assay (using a maximum of 30 mL for a complete dose-response relationship) without impacting animals' sensitivity towards toxicants. A literature review on existing miniaturisation approaches was used as a starting point. Subsequently, assays employing conventional as well as reduced test volumes were compared for 16 selected test substances with a diverse spectrum of lipophilicity. Results showed that there are differences in EC

Indexed as

crustaceaenvironmental monitoringextract testinggroundwaterleachate testingmicroplasticminiaturisationnanoparticlepesticideplankton testing

Identifiers

PMID39925409
PMCPMC11804477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.