Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925383›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Brain lesion MRI and co-related MRS spectroscopy dataset.

Sura Riyadh Saleh, Suhad A Yousif, Israa Qader Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sura Riyadh SalehInformatics Institute for Postgraduate Studies, Iraqi Commission for Computers and Informatics, Baghdad, Iraq.
Suhad A YousifDepartment of Computer Science, College of Science, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Israa Qader AhmedDepartment of Neuroradiology, Neurosurgical Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysing brain lesions of various aetiologies necessitates imaging data with subsequent diagnostic techniques that may enable concomitant visualization of spatial anatomical entities, and aberrant molecular behaviour. To fulfil this necessity, several image types and modalities should be collected. This dataset includes MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) with three modalities T2-FLAIR, T1-weighted pre- and post-contrast along with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) scans for 55 patients. All patients were diagnosed with neoplastic and non-neoplastic brain lesions. T2-FLAIR and contrast-enhanced T1 MRI modalities reveal structural differences in lesions, whereas MRS affords metabolite information. In addition to the imaging data, patient metadata such as age, gender, and expert diagnosis- classify brain lesions into two types: neoplastic (low or high grade) and non-neoplastic. The data were collected between 2023 and 2024 at Al-Andalus Oncology Centre in Baghdad, Iraq, and are publicly available. This dataset is essential as it combines conventional (MRI) and metabolic (MRS) imaging with expert diagnosis information. This dataset is significant as it includes MRI and MRS images along with expert diagnoses information, offering high reuse potential in medical imaging and diagnostic research.

Indexed as

Brain tumourMRST1 and post-contrast T1T2-FLAIR

Identifiers

PMID39925383
PMCPMC11803204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.