Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925355›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Working memory and the need for explainable AI - Scenarios from healthcare, social media and insurance.

M Liebherr, E Gößwein, C Kannen, A Babiker, S Al-Shakhsi, V Staab, B J Li, R Ali, C Montag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M LiebherrDepartment of General Psychology: Cognition, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
E GößweinDepartment of General Psychology: Cognition, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
C KannenDepartment of Molecular Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
A BabikerCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.
S Al-ShakhsiCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.
V StaabDepartment of General Psychology: Cognition, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
B J LiWee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
R AliCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.
C MontagDepartment of Molecular Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explainable AI (XAI) is discussed as an important feature of AI systems that is required for professional, ethical and commercial reasons. XAI is particularly needed in AI systems that remain relatively closed, i.e. black box, on how to make decisions whether for complexity or commercial sensitivity. Still, many factors play an important role on whether people perceive a need for XAI. The personal relevance of the AI system might play a role, but also individual differences in personality traits or cognitive functions. In order to test these assumptions, 215 participants (129 female) underwent an online experiment testing their objective working memory capacity and completed the Intellect facet of the Big Five Personality traits (as a proxy for self-assessed cognitive capacity). Further, all participants were presented three AI systems scenarios of relatively different degrees of (personal) relevance and, hence, personal investment: skin cancer detection (i), the personalization of social media feeds (ii), and the amount to pay for a car insurance (iii). We observed that people reported a higher need for XAI in scenarios where they were more personally invested (health, payment for insurance > social media); for signficant differences between these scenarios see the result section. Interestingly, working memory capacity was not associated with XAI needs across the three domains, but self-reported Intellect showed a mild positive association with need for an AI explanation in the context of the insurance story. The present study represents a first attempt to investigate objective working memory capacity in the context of need for XAI. Beyond that, the study indicates that personal investment is crucial for determining the need for XAI.

Indexed as

CognitionContextIntellectPersonalityWorking memoryXAI

Identifiers

PMID39925355
PMCPMC11804545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.