ArticleHeliyon2025
The performance of a machine learning model in predicting accelerometer-derived walking speed.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Movement Behaviors in Youth on the Autism Spectrum: The HUNT Study, Norway.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Data Resource Profile: Device-measured physical activity and sleep in the HUNT4 study, Norway.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence and sports genomics: advancing precision sports science and athletic performance.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
- Volume and Intensity of Walking and Risk of Chronic Low Back Pain.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Associations of sport and exercise participation in adolescence with body composition and device-measured physical activity in adulthood: longitudinal data from the Norwegian HUNT study.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025Article
- Contribution of walking, running and cycling to moderate-to-vigorous and total physical activity in adolescents and adults across and within seasons: cross-sectional data from the Norwegian HUNT Study.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obtaining long-term measurements of walking speed in large-scale studies remains challenging. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the performance of a machine learning classifier in predicting slow (≤4 km/h), moderate (4.1-5.4 km/h), and brisk (≥5.5 km/h) walking speeds in adults based on dual and single accelerometer set-ups. Methods: Twenty-four adults (mean age [SD, range] 36.1 [11.9, 23-62] years) participated in the study. Two tri-axial accelerometers positioned on the thigh and low back were used to record body movements. A measuring wheel with a speedometer along with video recording were used to define and record consecutive 5-min periods with the three walking speeds and jogging during conditions resembling free-living. In addition, we included a 5-min period with gradual increase and decrease in walking speed from slow to brisk and vice versa. The video recordings were labelled and used as ground truth for training an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) machine learning classifier. Windows of 1, 3, and 5 s duration were used to train the classifier. The performance of the classifier was evaluated by leave-one-out cross-validation. Results: Total recording time was ∼600 min (∼25 min per participant). Performance metrics for predicting walking speeds (i.e., slow, moderate, brisk) and jogging were largely similar for the dual and single accelerometer set-ups as well as for the different window lengths. The highest overall accuracy was 91 % (SD 11 %, range 59-98 % for individual participants) using a dual accelerometer set-up and a 5-s window, whereas the lowest overall accuracy was 88 % (SD 11 %, range 51-96 % for individual participants) using a single thigh accelerometer set-up and a 1-s window. Conclusions: A machine learning classifier can be used to accurately predict slow, moderate, and brisk walking speeds based on both a dual and single accelerometer set-up on the thigh and/or low back.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.