Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925351›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

The performance of a machine learning model in predicting accelerometer-derived walking speed.

Aleksej Logacjov, Tonje Pedersen Ludvigsen, Kerstin Bach, Atle Kongsvold, Mats Flaaten, Tom Ivar Lund Nilsen, Paul Jarle Mork

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Movement Behaviors in Youth on the Autism Spectrum: The HUNT Study, Norway.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aleksej LogacjovDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Tonje Pedersen LudvigsenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Kerstin BachDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Atle KongsvoldDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Mats FlaatenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Tom Ivar Lund NilsenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Paul Jarle MorkDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obtaining long-term measurements of walking speed in large-scale studies remains challenging. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the performance of a machine learning classifier in predicting slow (≤4 km/h), moderate (4.1-5.4 km/h), and brisk (≥5.5 km/h) walking speeds in adults based on dual and single accelerometer set-ups. Methods: Twenty-four adults (mean age [SD, range] 36.1 [11.9, 23-62] years) participated in the study. Two tri-axial accelerometers positioned on the thigh and low back were used to record body movements. A measuring wheel with a speedometer along with video recording were used to define and record consecutive 5-min periods with the three walking speeds and jogging during conditions resembling free-living. In addition, we included a 5-min period with gradual increase and decrease in walking speed from slow to brisk and vice versa. The video recordings were labelled and used as ground truth for training an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) machine learning classifier. Windows of 1, 3, and 5 s duration were used to train the classifier. The performance of the classifier was evaluated by leave-one-out cross-validation. Results: Total recording time was ∼600 min (∼25 min per participant). Performance metrics for predicting walking speeds (i.e., slow, moderate, brisk) and jogging were largely similar for the dual and single accelerometer set-ups as well as for the different window lengths. The highest overall accuracy was 91 % (SD 11 %, range 59-98 % for individual participants) using a dual accelerometer set-up and a 5-s window, whereas the lowest overall accuracy was 88 % (SD 11 %, range 51-96 % for individual participants) using a single thigh accelerometer set-up and a 1-s window. Conclusions: A machine learning classifier can be used to accurately predict slow, moderate, and brisk walking speeds based on both a dual and single accelerometer set-up on the thigh and/or low back.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyPhysical activityValidity

Identifiers

PMID39925351
PMCPMC11804687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.