Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925339›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2025

The ecology of polyploid establishment and exclusion, with implications for polyploid biogeography.

Wilhelm H A Osterman, James G Hagan, Jeannette Whitton, Anne D Bjorkman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wilhelm H A OstermanDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 413 90, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6852-2903
James G HaganGothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Gothenburg, 413 90, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7504-3393
Jeannette WhittonDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1609-5203
Anne D BjorkmanDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 413 90, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2174-7800

Funding

Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse WAF KAW 2019.0202Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaVetenskapsrådet #2019-05264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between polyploid formation, triploid fitness and plant reproduction has been studied for over a century, and uniparental reproduction has long been recognized to play a crucial role in polyploid establishment. Yet, we lack a synthesized framework of how polyploid establishment is expected to be influenced by different reproductive modes among angiosperms. Here, we provide new perspectives on how uniparental reproduction, pollination ecology, triploid fitness and assortative mating can impact minority cytotype exclusion (MCE) and, thereby, the likelihood of polyploid establishment. We review the current state of knowledge of the reproductive mechanisms that impact polyploid establishment and discuss often overlooked aspects of these processes, such as the influence of pollinator communities on rates of self-pollination. We propose a framework for considering how variation in reproductive strategies and pollinator communities can impact the ability of a polyploid to overcome MCE. Finally, we propose links between patterns of variation in uniparental reproduction across plant communities and observed patterns in the distribution and abundance of polyploids.

Indexed as

EcologyPolyploidyGeographyPollinationReproductionabiotic stressarctic polyploidsclonalitymacroecologypollinationtriploidyvegetative reproductionwhole‐genome duplication

Identifiers

PMID39925339
PMCPMC11883057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.