Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925194›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Analysis of survival among biopsy-determined categories of kidney disease in dogs.

Devyn M Schultz, Carolina Rivera, Nicholas Jeffery, Rachel E Cianciolo, Jessica A Hokamp, Mary Anna Labato, Mary B Nabity

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Devyn M SchultzDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9873-0170
Carolina RiveraDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Nicholas JefferyDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9812-1788
Rachel E CiancioloNiche Diagnostics, LLC, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Jessica A HokampDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Mary Anna LabatoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7871-2479
Mary B NabityDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6787-822X

Funding

American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation 01658Morris Animal FoundationThe Veterinary Medical Scientist Research Training Program at Texas A&M University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are many causes of kidney disease in dogs. The association of the diagnostic category with survival is unknown.

objectiveDetermine survival outcomes for biopsy-determined diagnostic categories of kidney disease in dogs. ANIMALS: Six hundred forty-nine dogs were biopsied for evaluation of kidney disease.

methodsRetrospective study. Survival information was obtained for dogs whose kidney biopsy was submitted to the International Veterinary Renal Pathology Service between 2008 and 2018. Signalment, serum creatinine (sCr), urine protein : creatinine ratio (UPCR), and serum albumin (sAlb) were reported at the time of biopsy. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed for the 14 categories with >10 cases having follow-up to determine hazard ratios (HR), using focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) as baseline.

resultsThe median survival time (MST) for all dogs with follow-up (n = 649) was 608 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 109-1475 days). The most follow-up was obtained for FSGS (n = 138, MST 536 days). Dogs with renal amyloidosis (n = 80) had the shortest survival (MST 76 days, IQR 8-299 days) and, in the multivariate analysis including age, sCr, sAlb, and UPCR, an increased risk of death (HR 1.79 [95% CI: 1.22-2.65], P < .01). Dogs with podocytopathy, membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN), mixed MGN, membranoproliferative GN (MPGN), and mixed MPGN had decreased risk of death. Regardless of category, increasing age, sCr, and UPCR and decreased sAlb were associated with a greater risk of death.

conclusionsThe diagnostic category is associated with survival in dogs with kidney disease. Survival of individual dogs within each category was highly variable.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesKidney DiseasesAmyloidosisAnimalsBiopsyCreatinineDogsFemaleGlomerulosclerosis, Focal SegmentalKidneyMaleProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisCreatininechronic kidney diseaseglomerular diseasekidney biopsyproteinuria

Identifiers

PMID39925194
PMCPMC11808253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.