ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2025
Exploring Mental Health Nurses' Perspectives on the Australian Stepped Care Model in Primary Mental Health Services.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Working Together to Deliver Person-Centred Care Within the Stepped Care Model: An Australian Multidisciplinary Perspective.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary healthcare remains an essential aspect of mental health service delivery in most developed nations worldwide. Mental health nurses (MHNs) play an important role in the delivery of mental health care within primary health care settings. This study, a subset of a broader study, explores MHNs' experiences of the stepped care model (SCM) in Australian primary mental healthcare. Through semistructured interviews, the exploratory descriptive inquiry study explores the perspectives of eight MHNs on the implementation and effectiveness of the SCM across diverse settings, delving into their roles, motivations, approaches to care, experiences and the challenges encountered. Five themes were identified: the diverse roles of MHNs in the SCM, motivation to work in SCM, a consumer-centred approach, challenges of the SCM and 'it is great if you can get it'. Findings reveal diverse roles, from delivering psychotherapy to consumers presenting with mild to moderate needs to coordinating care for individuals presenting with severe and complex challenges. MHNs working in the SCM are driven by a desire to provide flexible, recovery-focused care. They prioritise consumer-centred approaches and tailored care to meet individual needs. They experience challenges, including professional isolation in some cases, resource constraints, limited session availability for the consumers they work with and administrative burdens. The study underscores the need for structural enhancements to optimise the SCM's effectiveness and meet diverse consumer needs. These insights from MHNs are relevant to policymakers, Primary Health Networks (PHNs), service providers and clinicians. Future research could expand the scope to include perspectives from various disciplines involved in the model, as well as consumers and carers accessing SCM services. Overall, this paper contributes valuable insights to the discourse on the effectiveness of the SCM through the lens of MHNs delivering care within the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.