Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925139›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of mental health nursing2025

Transforming Alcohol and Other Drug Education Through Co-Design.

Mark Goodhew, Sonia Matiuk, Carmen Axisa, Chris Gough, Jo River

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Co-Design of an Evidence-Based Health Education Strategy to Improve Bowel Cancer Awareness and Screening in a Remote Tasmanian Community: Lessons Learned.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark GoodhewSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sonia MatiukFaculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Carmen AxisaFaculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Chris GoughCanberra Alliance of Harm Minimisation & Advocacy, Canberra, Australia.
Jo RiverFaculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5270-4013

Funding

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Technology, Sydney
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, as a broader push to address community needs and improve health outcomes, socially marginalised people have become increasingly involved in co-design research and education. More recently, people with lived experience of substance dependence have co-designed and co-delivered Alcohol and Other Drugs (AOD) education with nurse educators. Evaluations of co-designed AOD education have largely focused on educational and clinical outcomes but not on the process of co-design. Because of this gap, there is a need for research that explores the process of undertaking co-design with people who use substances and clinicians, including facilitators and barriers to the process that are specific to these groups. This research reports on a qualitative study exploring the barriers, facilitators, and perceived value of a co-design process for an AOD clinical education program involving people with lived experience of substance use, nurse clinicians, and academics (nursing and public health). The participants reported that building trusting relationships and skilled facilitation enhanced the co-design process, enabling positive conditions for working in partnership to achieve the project outcomes. However, challenging interpersonal dynamics, lack of adequate resources, and overly directive facilitation could impact team dynamics and undermine the co-design process. Authentic co-design has the potential to transform AOD education, ensuring that it centres the needs of people with lived experience. However, co-design initiatives require adequate resourcing and time to develop equal and respectful relationships for this vision to be realised.

Indexed as

Substance-Related DisordersHumansQualitative Researchco‐designconsumer participationevaluation researchhealth educationqualitativesubstance use

Identifiers

PMID39925139
PMCPMC11808349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.