Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39925046›Full record

ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

Cancer Awareness and Screening Practices of Ghanaian Adults: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Patrick Kafui Akakpo, Martin Gameli Akakpo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick Kafui AkakpoDepartment of Pathology - School of Medical Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Martin Gameli AkakpoDepartment of Human Development and Psychology - Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Regent University College of Science and Technology, Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-5740-8213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer screening has been identified as an important contributor to cancer prevention and the control of both morbidity and mortality from cancer. Despite its importance, screening rates have remained low in Ghana. This study investigated some key predictors of screening habits and the rates of awareness for selected cancers that are amenable to screening and early detection. The health belief model provided theoretical support for the investigation.

methodsData was collected from 503 adults in an online survey with a questionnaire, between June and August 2021. Univariate statistical analysis was used to determine the frequencies and percentages of variables. The multivariate analysis used a correlation and a logistic regression to measure association and test a model.

resultsParticipants were aged between 18 and 74 with a mean age of 32.74. Females made up 61.4% of the sample while males accounted for 38.6%. Only 37.6% of participants had previously screened for cancer while 62.4% had never screened. The study hypothesized that age, gender, and Cancer Awareness predict the Cancer Screening habits of respondents. The logistic regression showed that, Age (B = 0.10, SE = 0.01, p = 0.00) and Gender (B = -0.2.71, SE = 0.30, p = 0.00) predicted cancer screening habit.

conclusionAge and gender can predict screening habits. Awareness did not predict screening in this study. The reason and meaning of the findings are discussed and suggestions for improvement of screening uptake and for future research are provided.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGhanaHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultawarenesscancer screeningdeterminantsonline surveyprevention

Identifiers

PMID39925046
PMCPMC11808213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.