ArticleBrain and behavior2025
Cross-Modal Transfer Effects of the Go/No-Go Training With Visual Stimuli.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Cognitive, Simulator, and Real-World Training on Novice Driver Gaze Behaviour: A Pre-Post Study.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- Cross-modal predictive oculomotor control: visually acquired prediction transfers to vestibular-driven eye movements.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMotor task performance guided by one sensory modality (e.g., visual stimuli) can be improved by training; however, whether this training can also improve performance on the same task guided by another sensory modality remains uncertain (e.g., tactile stimuli). This study examined the effects of Go/No-go task training using visual stimulus cues on Go/No-go task performance using tactile cues and whether training also influences the dominance of the sensory modality.
methodsGo/No-go tasks and a temporal order judgment (TOJ) task were performed by 24 right-handed, healthy adults on days 1 and 5 of the 5-day experiment. Furthermore, a subpopulation (the training group) practiced the Go/No-go task with visual stimulus cues on days 2-4, whereas the remaining control group did not practice the task.
resultsThe training group demonstrated significantly reduced reaction times (RTs) on both the visual and tactile Go/No-go tasks by day 5, whereas the control group demonstrated significantly reduced RTs only on the tactile Go/No-go task. The RT change was also significantly greater in the training group than in the control group for both modalities. Conversely, no significant change in the TOJ for visual and tactile stimuli was observed between the groups.
conclusionThese results indicate that motor training with visual guidance can improve performance on the same task guided by tactile stimuli, possibly due to neuroplastic changes in the multimodal association cortices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.