Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39924949›Full record

ReviewBrain and behavior2025

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Pregnancy: Efficacy, Safety, and Future Implications for Perinatal Mental Health Care.

Serena Angeline, Babangida Tiyatiye, Wole Akosile

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Korean Medication Algorithm for Depressive Disorder 2025, Fifth Revision: An Executive Summary.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Serena AngelinePrince Charles Hospital, Metro North Mental Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Babangida TiyatiyePerth Clinic, School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Wole AkosileNew Farm Clinic, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, National Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3183-9047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has gained interest as a treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the literature on its efficacy and safety for pregnant patients with MDD is limited. This article reviews and appraises available studies on TMS in pregnant women with MDD.

methodsWe reviewed randomized controlled trials and open-label studies on TMS in pregnant women with MDD.

resultsStudies indicate that TMS is a safe and effective treatment for MDD during pregnancy, showing significant reductions in depression scores and increased response and remission rates compared to sham TMS. TMS was well tolerated with minimal side effects.

conclusionLarger, multicenter trials are needed to develop evidence-based protocols for TMS use in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderPregnancy ComplicationsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationFemaleHumansPerinatal CarePregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomedepressionobstetricpregnancyrTMSTMStranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39924949
PMCPMC11808189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.