Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39924930›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior

Sex Differences in Perception of Economic and Dating Access.

Rachel E Hall, Khandis Blake, Ho Fai Chan, Benno Torgler, Stephen Whyte

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel E HallSchool of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Khandis BlakeMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Ho Fai ChanSchool of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Benno TorglerSchool of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Stephen WhyteSchool of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9464-1110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mating and labor markets are fundamental drivers of societal dynamics. Yet, equity of access to these domains differs between the sexes due to numerous biological, economic, psychological, and socio-cultural factors. These inequalities and their impacts can accentuate perceptions, preferences, and behaviors of males and females in different ways. Utilizing a large cross-sectional sample of those currently engaged in the Australian mating market (

Indexed as

EmploymentInterpersonal RelationsSocial PerceptionSocioeconomic FactorsAdolescentAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsYoung Adultgenderlabor marketmating marketonline datingsex difference

Identifiers

PMID39924930
PMCPMC11808775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.