SynthesisJournal of intensive care medicine2026
The Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Critically ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative effectiveness of inspiratory muscle training approaches within intensive care unit-acquired weakness prevention and rehabilitation strategies: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of respiratory training on lung function in intensive care unit patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Targeting the diaphragm during weaning from mechanical ventilation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Effects of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Mapping the Evidence on Abdominal Weight Training for Respiratory Muscle Strength: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Phase-Related Resting Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Adults: Metabolic Phenotypes and Determinants of Weight-Normalized Indices-A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeThe onset of diaphragmatic weakness begins within hours of commencing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), which may contribute to the physical disability that can persist at five years after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has the potential to alleviate the negative effects of IMV.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with an approach consistent with Cochrane methods. We registered our review a priori (PROSPERO: CRD 42023451809) and published our protocol. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which enrolled adults (≥18 years) admitted to ICU who required IMV for ≥24 h were eligible if they delivered an IMT intervention using an external device that provided airway resistance (eg, threshold device, tapered flow resistive device) compared to usual care. Our primary outcome was physical function. Secondary outcomes included respiratory muscle strength, mortality, length of stay, IMV weaning time, reintubation rate, dyspnea and endurance. We searched Medline, Embase, Emcare, AMED, CINAHL, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov from inception and used the Covidence platform for study selection and data extraction. We reported results as standardized mean difference (SMD) if outcome measures were similar. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) to assess the certainty of evidence.ResultsWe screened 12 945 studies and 18 met the inclusion criteria. Three studies reported the effects of IMT on physical function. IMT may have no effect on physical function (SMD = -0.05, 95% confidence interval: -0.46 to 0.36) however results are very uncertain.ConclusionOur results suggest physical function is not impacted by IMT; however, our results are based on a limited number of studies with small samples sizes. High quality, appropriately powered RCTs are needed to improve the precision of the effect estimate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.