ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2025
Genetic and biomarker disclosure process in a memory and aging study.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dementia risk factors and biomarkers in subjective cognitive decline: real world evidence from the monza brain health service.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite growing awareness that disclosing biomarker results to research participants is aligned with ethical principles of researcher-participant partnership, there are currently no widely adopted guidelines for this disclosure in Alzheimer's disease research. We developed a process and tools to deliver biomarker and genetic results to 65 participants of The Memory and Aging Study of the Duke-UNC Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC). Survey responses of 46 participants were analyzed. We show high participant satisfaction and lower anxiety levels after receiving the results. The developed process and materials provide a template for standardized Alzheimer's disease biomarker result delivery in the research setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.