Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39924872›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2025

Evolution of growth strategy in alligators and caimans informed by osteohistology of the late Eocene early-diverging alligatoroid crocodylian Diplocynodon hantoniensis.

D K Hoffman, E R Goldsmith, A Houssaye, S C R Maidment, R N Felice, P D Mannion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. State-of-the-Art Age Determination Methods for Amphibians and Reptiles.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D K HoffmanDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9241-8038
E R GoldsmithDepartment of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-1782-7079
A HoussayeDépartement Adaptations du Vivant, UMR 7179 CNRS, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
S C R MaidmentFossil Reptiles, Amphibians and Birds Section, Natural History Museum London, London, UK.
R N FeliceScience Group, Natural History Museum London, London, UK.
P D MannionDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Leverhulme Trust RPG-2021-202Natural Environment Research Council NE/X014010/1Royal Society UF160216Royal Society URF\R\221010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among living crocodylians, alligatoroids exhibit a wide range of body sizes and a biogeographic distribution that spans tropical-to-subtropical climates. The fossil record of alligatoroids, however, reveals even greater diversity, including multiple examples of gigantism and a broader distribution that extends into polar latitudes. Osteohistological studies on extant alligatoroids show that living alligators and caimans both exhibit seasonal growth, with roughly comparable growth rates. However, alligators and caimans diverged from one another over 60 million years ago; the dearth of studies on extinct alligatoroids makes it unclear if the shared condition in extant taxa reflects convergent responses to rapid climatic changes in the recent past or represents the ancestral condition in alligatoroids. Additionally, sample sizes are often limited to one or two individuals, especially in extinct crocodylians, obscuring any intraspecific variation present. To address this uncertainty, we conducted the largest monospecific osteohistological study of an extinct crocodylian to date, based on a sample of nine femora, providing unique insight into the intraspecific variation in growth of the early-diverging alligatoroid Diplocynodon hantoniensis from the late Eocene of the UK. The bone microanatomy of D. hantoniensis shows moderate compactness, with a well-defined medullary cavity, and osteohistological features that are generally consistent with those of extant alligatoroids. Samples vary greatly along a continuum in the degree of remodelling and vascularity, highlighting both the importance of evaluating intraspecific variation and limitations of basing histological assessments on singleton samples. Ontogenetic assessment indicates that our sample captures a range of skeletally immature to mature individuals, approximately corresponding to femoral size, but with notable exceptions possibly driven by sexual dimorphism. Body size estimates for D. hantoniensis (1.2-3.4 m) fall within the typical range of living American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis). Reconstruction from cyclical growth marks indicates a similar overall growth rate between D. hantoniensis and A. mississippiensis. As in extant alligatoroids more generally, this is determinate, seasonally-controlled growth. Femoral circumference scales positively with femoral length in D. hantoniensis, demonstrating similar allometry to A. mississippiensis. This differs from some other extant crocodylians (e.g. Crocodylus niloticus and Crocodylus johnstoni) and suggests conservation of allometric relationships in alligatoroids. This in-depth look into an early diverging alligatoroid indicates that seasonality and growth rates present in extant members were established near the base of the clade. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of including larger samples of singular species in order to capture potential variation when making clade-wide interpretations.

Indexed as

Alligators and CrocodilesBiological EvolutionFossilsAnimalsBone and Bonesallometryhistologymicroanatomyontogeny

Identifiers

PMID39924872
PMCPMC12159324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.