ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2025
Preferences for treatment outcomes in rectal cancer: A discrete choice experiment among patients and healthy volunteers.
Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preferences for treatment outcomes in rectal cancer: A discrete choice experiment among patients and healthy volunteers.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTreatment for rectal cancer can leave patients with a permanent stoma or bowel dysfunction. In this work we aimed to examine preferences for treatment outcomes among people with and without rectal cancer.
methodOur discrete choice experiment examined the effect of risk of cancer recurrence, presence of a stoma and bowel dysfunction on treatment preferences in 372 rectal cancer patients without a stoma, 269 with a stoma and 204 people without cancer.
resultsPredictors of treatment preferences differed significantly between all groups (p < 0.0001). Avoiding a stoma was more important to stoma-naïve groups, while avoiding bowel dysfunction was more important to those with superior function. Reducing the risk of recurrence was valued highly, and equally, across the groups.
conclusionExperience of a stoma or bowel dysfunction resulted in higher tolerance of those treatment outcomes. Hearing from patients living with different treatment outcomes could help prepare newly diagnosed patients, and facilitate informed decision-making where patients have a choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.