Trial reportBJS open2024
Minimally invasive lung surgery with an intraoperative completely or partially tubeless protocol: randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05269784 (Minimally Invasive Lung Surgery Under ERAS With Completely Tubeless Protocol Compared With That With Partially Tubeless Protocol), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Minimally Invasive Lung Surgery Under ERAS With Completely Tubeless Protocol Compared With That With Partially Tubeless Protocol
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of non-intubated anesthesia on postoperative pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic segmentectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Nonintubated Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Tracheoesophageal Fistula Repair.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2026Article
- Bibliometric and visualization analysis of non-intubated thoracic anaesthesia [2014-2025].Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of safety and efficacy of non-intubation in lung wedge resection using thoracoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Non‑intubated general anesthesia with a supraglottic airway for heart transplantation: a preliminary cohort study of feasibility and enhanced recovery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Tubeless uniportal VATS in thoracic surgery - Indications, ERAS pathways, and outcomes: A review.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a preoperative nomogram for predicting venous thromboembolism risk after gynecologic oncology surgery.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Research advances of tubeless thoracic surgery for pulmonary nodules: current status and future challenges.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Robot-assisted thoracoscopic tracheal carina resection and reconstruction under spontaneous-ventilation anesthesia with a single-lumen endotracheal tube: case report and literature review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThoracic surgery is an invasive procedure and there has been a move towards minimally invasive approaches. This includes video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery without endotracheal intubation has been developed with a view to avoiding complications associated with intubation including tracheal injury, vocal cord injury and lung impairment due to mechanical ventilation. This study aims to compare outcomes from non-intubated 'completely tubeless' versus intubated 'partially tubeless' minimally invasive thoracic surgery.
methodsA single-institution, prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted comparing patients who underwent minimally invasive lung completely tubeless versus partially tubeless surgery, both with enhanced recovery. The primary outcome was the short-term postoperative complication rate. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the significant predictors of severe mediastinal shift and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve plots were drawn.
resultsAmong the 348 patients, 174 patients were assigned to the completely tubeless group and 174 patients were assigned to the partially tubeless group. There was no difference in postoperative complications including pulmonary complications, supraventricular arrhythmia, acute myocardial infarction, acute cerebral stroke, venous thromboembolism and urinary retention. The completely tubeless protocol was associated with a higher proportion of early mobilization (66.7% versus 55.7%, P = 0.047), a shorter median duration of drainage (1.0 versus 2.0 days, P = 0.002), and a shorter median duration of postoperative hospital stay (2.0 versus 3.0 days, P = 0.001). The completely tubeless group had less of a difference in white blood cell count before and after the operation (P = 0.042). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that weight was a significant predictor of mediastinal shift in the completely tubeless group.
conclusionUnder enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, there is no difference in postoperative complications in patients undergoing completely or partially tubeless surgery. However, patients having completely tubeless surgery have shorter durations of postoperative drainage, shorter durations of hospital stay, milder systemic inflammatory reactions, and better immune protection than patients who undergo lung resection with a partially tubeless protocol. The severity of mediastinal shift may be mainly related to body-weight. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05269784 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.