ArticlePhysiological reports2025
Antioxidant activity and protective effect of phyto-active compounds of Crataegus azarolus berries decoction extract against acetic acid-induced hepatorenal injuries in male rats.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regulatory effects of hawthorn on lipid metabolic homeostasis: mechanisms, evidences, and perspectives.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Antioxidant activity and protective effect of phyto-active compounds of Crataegus azarolus berries decoction extract against acetic acid-induced hepatorenal injuries in male rats.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study evaluated the hepato-nephronal protective properties of Crataegus azarolus berries decoction extract (CAB-DE) on acetic acid (AA)-induced oxidative stress and metabolic disorders in rats. Animals (60 rats) were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10), with groups 1 and 2 being controls and groups 3, 4, and 5 given increasing doses of CAB-DE, group 6 were given gallic acid until ulcerative colitis was induced and then intoxicated by an acute intra-rectal infusion of AA. Our results showed that CAB-DE-oral administration had no signs of toxicity or abnormal behavior in rats, with a LD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.