ArticleInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society2025
Variations in intracranial arterial anatomy of the circle of Willis and their association with arteriosclerosis in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
Article in International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Anatomic variations in basilar artery termination: a systematic review and meta-analysis with presentation of an illustrative case.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Pooled it
- Statin Use and Arterial Calcification in the General Population: A Longitudinal Analysis and a Negative Control Population.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Article
- Dysfunction of hippocampal cells and its role in cognitive impairment.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Real-time phase-contrast MRI can be used to quantify cerebrovascular reserve capacity - a comparative study to neurovascular ultrasound in healthy subjects.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAn estimated 20-31% of all people are born with a textbook anatomical configuration of the intracranial arteries comprising the Circle of Willis. Individuals with specific anatomical variants may be at elevated risk of intracranial arteriosclerosis, and possibly its sequelae of stroke and dementia, as the distribution of blood flow and pressure is known to be different in variants with missing arteries or arterial segments. Therefore, we studied the association of anatomical variation of intracranial arteries with arteriosclerosis.
methodsBetween December 2005 and October 2010, 1126 patients (mean age: 62.3 (SD: ±14.0) years, 48.0% female) were recruited, 59.9% of whom had ischemic stroke and 40.1% a transient ischemic attack (TIA). Within the routine diagnostic work-up for stroke, patients underwent cranial computed tomography (CT) angiography. These images enabled a detailed visualization of intracranial arteries, which allowed for the assessment of the anatomical configuration of the cerebral arteries, the anterior and posterior communicating arteries, the internal carotids, and the vertebrobasilar arteries. In addition, these images facilitated the identification of intracranial arterial calcifications, the defining feature of intracranial arteriosclerosis. Binomial logistic regression models adjusting for age, sex, and ethnicity were constructed to assess associations between intracranial artery variations and presence of intracranial arterial calcifications.
resultsAn incomplete Circle of Willis, defined by aplasia of any arterial segment, was present in 875 (77.7%) patients. The most common variation found was aplasia of the right posterior communicating artery, in 52.0% of patients. Men more often presented with an incomplete anatomy as compared to women (adjusted odds ratio: 1.36 (95% CI = 1.02-1.81)). Intracranial artery calcification was present in 59.2% of patients. Incompleteness of the intracranial arteries was not associated with the presence of any intracranial artery calcification (0.95 (0.68-1.34)). However, specific variants were associated with specific locations of intracranial artery calcification: The prevalence of vertebrobasilar artery calcification was lower among those with fetal-type posterior cerebral artery compared to individuals with a normal posterior cerebral artery (0.61 (0.38-0.99)). The prevalence of vertebrobasilar artery calcification was higher among those with a-/hypoplasia of both posterior communicating arteries as compared to those with normal posterior communicating arteries (1.63 (1.00-2.66)). Furthermore, patients with a-/hypoplastic left A1-segments had a higher prevalence of right internal carotid artery calcification as compared to people with a normal left A1-segment (2.30 (1.00-5.26)).
conclusionThe prevalence of arteriosclerosis in the intracranial arteries on CT imaging varies among patients with certain anatomical variants of the intracranial arterial system. Specifically, arteriosclerosis in the right internal carotid artery and the vertebrobasilar arteries was more frequently observed in patients who had an a-/hypoplastic left anterior cerebral artery or a-/hypoplasia of both posterior communicating arteries, respectively. In addition, arteriosclerosis was less frequently observed among vertebrobasilar arteries of patients with a fetal-type posterior cerebral artery. Future longitudinal research is warranted regarding the anatomical configuration of intracranial arteries and the development of intracranial arteriosclerosis, as this line of research may reveal a novel group of people at elevated risk of cerebrovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.