ArticleClinical rheumatology2025
Early axial spondyloarthritis versus established disease: a single-center analysis based on the new ASAS definition of early disease.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining early axial spondyloarthritis: insights and applications of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society international consensus.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026Review
- Prevalence and clinical features of early axial spondyloarthritis according to ASAS definition: a cross-sectional analysis from the reuma-check cohort.Rheumatology international · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe applicability of the new Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) consensus definition of early axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) has barely been tested in clinical settings. We aimed to check the applicability of this new definition in a real clinical context.
methodsSingle-center cross-sectional study involving 330 consecutive patients fulfilling axSpA criteria. Similarities and differences between patients with early (according to the new ad hoc definition) and established disease were analyzed. Logistic regression models adjusted for sex and exposure to biologic therapies were constructed to analyze the different disease outcomes between both subpopulations.
resultsOf 299 patients for whom information on defining characteristics of early axSpA could be reliably collated, 45 (15%) met the ASAS definition of early axSpA, median disease duration of 1.0 year [IQR, 1.0-2.0]. Compared to established disease, these patients were younger (p = 0.001), with a similar male-to-female ratio, and a higher exposure to NSAIDs (p = 0.015) but lower to biologics (p = 0.005). Uveitis prevalence was similar between both groups (early, 15.6% and established, 16.1%). Regardless of sex and biologic therapy, inflammatory burden, disease activity and the impact on quality of life were similar in both groups. As expected, structural damage was higher among established cases. Also, regardless of disease duration and exposure to biologic therapies, men had better disease outcomes than women.
conclusionPatients with early axSpA present similarities and differences with respect to established cases. The new ASAS definition of early disease may be applicable in real-world clinical settings. KEY POINTS: • Patients with early axial spondyloarthritis show similarities and differences with respect to established cases. • The overall burden of disease is similar in both subgroups of patients with axial SpA. • In both study groups, men showed better disease outcomes than women. • The new ASAS definition of early axial spondyloarthritis is applicable in real-life clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39924608What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.