Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39924576›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2025

Knowledge of PrEP Among Healthcare Workers in Substance Use Disorder Services: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy.

Giuseppina Lo Moro, Lorenzo Rosset, Maria Grazia Varì, Alfio Lucchini, Roberta Balestra, Giacomo Scaioli, Roberta Siliquini, Fabrizio Bert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giuseppina Lo MoroDepartment of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, 10126, Italy.
Lorenzo RossetDepartment of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, 10126, Italy.
Maria Grazia VarìDepartment of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, 10126, Italy. mariagrazia.vari@unito.it.ORCID 0009-0009-1209-591X
Alfio LucchiniFederazione Italiana degli Operatori dei Dipartimenti e dei Servizi delle Dipendenze, (FeDerSerD: Italian Federation of Workers of the Addiction Departments and Services), Milan, Italy.
Roberta BalestraFederazione Italiana degli Operatori dei Dipartimenti e dei Servizi delle Dipendenze, (FeDerSerD: Italian Federation of Workers of the Addiction Departments and Services), Milan, Italy.
Giacomo ScaioliDepartment of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, 10126, Italy.
Roberta Siliquini *Department of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, 10126, Italy.
Fabrizio Bert *Department of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, 10126, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an evidence-based strategy for HIV prevention, particularly for high-risk populations such as people who inject drugs and engage in chemsex. In Italy, there is no data on the actual knowledge of PrEP among Healthcare professionals (HCPs) in substance use disorder services (SerDs). This study aimed to assess PrEP awareness among SerD HCPs, also exploring their level of knowledge, practice, training, and perceived barriers. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a convenience sample of HCPs from SerDs across Italy (2023-2024). The questionnaire addressed sociodemographic and work-related information, PrEP awareness, knowledge scores (i.e. percentage of correct answers) on when proposing PrEP and reimbursement criteria, practice, and training received. Multiple logistic regression was performed to explore associations with PrEP awareness. The sample consisted of 306 professionals (26.8% physicians). Only 44.8% were aware of PrEP, with lower awareness among non-physicians (p < 0.001). As for knowledge scores on when proposing PrEP and on reimbursement, the median was 57.14% (IQR: 42.86-71.43%) and 55.56% (IQR: 33.33-66.67%), respectively. No differences were reported across professional roles. Only 10.36% reported PrEP is offered at their workplace and 87.9% highlighted a lack of training. Additionally, 96.79% believed it would be appropriate for HCPs to receive PrEP training; however, nurses were the most likely to state it is not appropriate (p = 0.046). The study identified gaps in PrEP knowledge and training among SerD professionals, including physicians. The strong interest in training suggests that SerD HCPs, though with varying perceptions, may be a receptive group for interventions for improving PrEP implementation.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSubstance-Related DisordersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAddictionHealthcare workersHIVPre-exposure prophylaxisSubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID39924576
PMCPMC12301269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.