ArticleScientific reports2025
An efficient artificial neural network-based optimization techniques for the early prediction of coronary heart disease: comprehensive analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fusion prediction model for post-ERCP pancreatitis under NSAIDs prophylaxis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Wave-aware mortality prediction in COVID-19: a multi-stage feature selection and explainable machine-learning framework.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Building the next frontier: Artificial intelligence in 3D-printed medicines.Biomaterials translational · 2026Review
- Evaluation of coronary heart disease risk prediction based on simple physical examination parameters by machine learning model: a retrospective cohort model development and validation study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- An Explainable Approach to Parkinson's Diagnosis Using the Contrastive Explanation Method-CEM.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the world's leading cause of death, contributing to a high mortality rate. This emphasizes the requirement for an advanced decision support system in order to evaluate the risk of CHD. This study presents an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based intelligent healthcare system to predict the risk of CHD. The proposed ANN model is trained using the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) dataset, which comprises 4240 data instances and 15 potential risk factors. To combat overfitting, the proposed model uses four hidden dense layers with dropout rates ranging from 0.5 to 0.2. Also, two activation functions, ReLU and LeakyReLU, are used in conjunction with four optimizers: Adam, SGD, RMSProp, and AdaDelta to fine-tune the parameters and minimize the loss functions. Moreover, three sophisticated preprocessing methods, SMOTE, SMOTETomek, and SMOTEENN, along with the proposed two-stage sampling approach, are applied to address the target class data imbalance. Experimental results demonstrate that the Adam optimizer coupled with the ReLU activation function and the combined sequential effect of SMOTEENN and SMOTETomek's two-stage sampling approach achieved superior performance. The validation accuracy reached 96.25% with a recall value of 0.98, outperforming existing approaches reported in the literature. The combined effect of approaches will be evidence of the modern healthcare decision-making support system for the risk prediction of CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.