ArticleScientific reports2025
Factor structure and measurement invariance of exercise self-efficacy scale among secondary school students in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measuring attitudes toward artificial intelligence: validation of the Chinese ATTARI-12 and invariance across genders and academic disciplines.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES) is widely used to assess individuals' exercise self-efficacy through self-reporting. It includes one factor and 18 items that gauge one's confidence in exercising under various conditions, such as when tired, stressed, or in unfavourable weather. Evidence indicates that differences in the original factor structure and psychometric properties were observed across different populations, including school-age students, university students, and adults. This study examined the factor structure, reliability, convergent validity, and measurement invariance of the Chinese version of the ESES among secondary school students. Data from 856 students (age: M = 13.80, SD = 0.94) were analysed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to identify the best-fitting factor structure. The reliability and convergent validity were tested using the collected data. Configural, metric, and scalar invariances, as well as the likelihood ratio test, were tested for measurement invariance. A 14-item, two-factor structure of the ESES, consistently demonstrated the best fit among secondary school students. The two-factor structure showed strong internal consistency reliability (McDonald's Omega of 0.921 and 0.843) and satisfactory convergent validity (average variance extracted values of 0.582 and 0.478, composite reliability values of 0.917 and 0.845). Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (likelihood ratio test, p > 0.01) revealed scalar measurement invariance across sex, ethnic backgrounds, grades, and school locations. These findings suggest that the 14-item, two-factor Chinese version of the ESES is suitable for use with secondary-school students. Future studies could confirm these findings by examining the 14-item, two-factor ESES in diverse samples, considering ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and age range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.