Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39924571›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative performance of multiple ensemble learning models for preoperative prediction of tumor deposits in rectal cancer based on MR imaging.

Jiayi Wang, Fayong Hu, Jin Li, Wenzhi Lv, Zhiyong Liu, Liang Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiayi Wang *Computer Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Fayong Hu *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Jin LiComputer Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Wenzhi LvBritton Chance Center and MoE Key Laboratory for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Zhiyong LiuSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. zhiyongliu@hust.edu.cn.
Liang WangComputer Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. nywl@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62072349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensemble learning can effectively mitigate the risk of model overfitting during training. This study aims to evaluate the performance of ensemble learning models in predicting tumor deposits in rectal cancer (RC) and identify the optimal model for preoperative clinical decision-making. A total of 199 RC patients were analyzed, with radiomic features extracted from T2-weighted and apparent diffusion coefficient images and selected through advanced statistical methods. After that, the bagging-ensemble learning model (random forest), boosting-ensemble learning model (XGBoost, AdaBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost), and voting-ensemble learning model (integrating 5 classifiers) were applied and optimized using grid search with tenfold cross-validation. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, calibration curve, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), and decision curve analysis were adopted to evaluate the performance of each model. The voting-ensemble learning model (VELM) performs best in the testing cohort, with an AUC of 0.875 and an accuracy of 0.800. Notably, Calibration plots confirmed VELM's stability and t-SNE visualization illustrated clear clustering of radiomic features. Decision curve analysis further validated the VELM's superior net benefit across a range of clinical thresholds, underscoring its potential as a reliable tool for clinical decision-making in RC.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedEnsemble LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveEnsemble learningMachine learningPredictionRadiomicsRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID39924571
PMCPMC11808052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.