Observational studyAnnals of hematology2025
Prevalence, incidence, and thromboembolic events in polycythemia vera: a study based on longitudinal German health claims data.
Observational study in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk of thromboembolic events in patients with polycythaemia vera: a study based on german health claims data.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is little evidence, particularly in Germany, on the epidemiology and the cytoreductive management of polycythemia vera (PV). We performed an observational study based on anonymized health claims data to provide estimates of the epidemiology of PV in Germany, to describe the use of cytoreductive drugs in patients with PV, and to assess the occurrence of thromboembolic events (TEs) in prevalent patients on continuous treatment with relevant cytoreductive drugs over time. For the year 2021, we estimated a PV prevalence of 28.6 per 100,000 and an incidence of 3.3 per 100,000 in the German adult population (≥ 18 years). We identified 83.2% of prevalent patients in 2021 as being at high risk for thromboembolic complications, based on age (≥ 60 years) and/or history of TEs. Contrary to treatment guidelines, 43.6% of these high-risk patients did not receive cytoreductive drug treatment in 2021. 63.5% of patients in 2021 who were treated with hydroxyurea (but not ruxolitinib) in that year, met our defined proxy criteria for intolerance/resistance to hydroxyurea. Over time, we observed a lower proportion of patients with TEs in patients continuously treated with ruxolitinib compared to patients treated with hydroxyurea who also met our defined proxy criteria for intolerance/resistance to hydroxyurea (35.8% vs. 56.3% after three years). Our findings suggest that currently available cytoreductive therapies are not being fully utilized according to treatment guidelines, which may lead to avoidable thromboembolic complications in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.