ArticleScientific reports2025
Trends in the disease burden of cystic echinococcosis in China, 1990-2044 analysis and forecasting study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Portal vein invasion and cavernous transformation secondary to hepatic echinococcosis successfully managed by TIPS: a case report and literature review.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Novel EG95-based mRNA vaccines induce long-term protective immunity against echinococcosis.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Spatio-temporal dynamics, trend analysis, and incidence prediction of echinococcosis in Xinjiang, China (2005-2024).BMC public health · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of cystic echinococcosis burden trends: a systematic evaluation of global and Chinese regional patterns using global burden of disease study 2021 data.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal distribution and control of echinococcosis in Xinjiang, 2005-2023.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Trends in the global burden of cystic echinococcosis among children and adolescents from 1990 to 2021: An analysis based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to analyze changes in the disease burden of cystic echinococcosis in China from 1990 to 2019 and to predict trends from 2020 to 2044. Using the Global Burden of Disease 2019 (GBD 2019) database, we analyzed the trends in annual percentage change (APC) and average annual percentage change (AAPC) for incidence, prevalence, death, and disability-adjusted life years (DALY) rates of cystic echinococcosis in China via the Joinpoint Regression Program 4.8.0.1 software. Additionally, we applied Nordpred modeling to predict future trends in disease burden over the next 25 years. From 1990 to 2019, the incidence and prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in the Chinese population showed an overall increasing trend, whereas the death and DALY rates exhibited an overall decreasing trend. The disease burden of cystic echinococcosis was greater in males than in females, with significant differences across age groups. The highest incidence and prevalence rates were observed in the 10-24 years age group, whereas the lowest occurred in the 0-9 years age group. Fatalities and DALY rates increased with age, particularly in the 70 and older age groups. According to the Nordpred modeling results, the incidence, prevalence, and DALY rates of cystic echinococcosis in China are expected to rise slightly over the next 25 years. The overall disease burden of cystic echinococcosis is projected to increase gradually between 2020 and 2044, with men exhibiting higher incidence, prevalence, and DALY rates than women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.