Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39924548›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Factors associated with false-positive screening mammography in São Paulo, Brazil.

Alice Barros Câmara, Luciane Simões Duarte, Lise Cristina Pereira Baltar Cury, Victor Wünsch Filho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alice Barros CâmaraDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo and Oncocentro Foundation of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. alicecamara@usp.br.
Luciane Simões DuarteDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo and Oncocentro Foundation of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lise Cristina Pereira Baltar CuryOncocentro Foundation of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Victor Wünsch FilhoDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo and Oncocentro Foundation of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/11794-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited data on the influence of various factors on mammography accuracy in low- and middle-income regions. In this cross-sectional study using registry data, we examined the sensitivity of screening mammograms by comparing mammography results with biopsies-confirmed breast cancer diagnoses in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Additionally, we evaluate factors related to the screened women and to the breast lesions that could affect false-positive mammograms results. All screening mammograms conducted from January to December 2012 and biopsy results from January 2012 to December 2013 in the São Paulo State were retrieved from the Brazilian Breast Cancer Information System. We gathered details on women-related factors such as age, hormone therapy usage, prior radiotherapy, skin color, education level, skin type, breast density, and familial history of cancer, as well as on breast lesions, including type, size, characteristics, edges, and topographic site on the breast. To assess the risk effect of these factors on false-positive mammography results, we employed logistic regression analyses. Our results indicate that age under 50 years, use of hormone therapy, dense breasts, lesions smaller than 10 mm with defined edges, and the presence of calcifications were predictors of false-positive mammograms results. Finally, we observed that false-positives lead to longer times to diagnosis. These findings are relevant for the planning and management of organized breast cancer screening programs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMammographyAdultAgedBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRisk FactorsBreast biopsyFalse-positive mammograms resultsLesion-related factorsLow- and middle-income regionsScreening mammogramWomen-related factors

Identifiers

PMID39924548
PMCPMC11808087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.