ArticleScientific reports2025
Factors associated with false-positive screening mammography in São Paulo, Brazil.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is limited data on the influence of various factors on mammography accuracy in low- and middle-income regions. In this cross-sectional study using registry data, we examined the sensitivity of screening mammograms by comparing mammography results with biopsies-confirmed breast cancer diagnoses in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Additionally, we evaluate factors related to the screened women and to the breast lesions that could affect false-positive mammograms results. All screening mammograms conducted from January to December 2012 and biopsy results from January 2012 to December 2013 in the São Paulo State were retrieved from the Brazilian Breast Cancer Information System. We gathered details on women-related factors such as age, hormone therapy usage, prior radiotherapy, skin color, education level, skin type, breast density, and familial history of cancer, as well as on breast lesions, including type, size, characteristics, edges, and topographic site on the breast. To assess the risk effect of these factors on false-positive mammography results, we employed logistic regression analyses. Our results indicate that age under 50 years, use of hormone therapy, dense breasts, lesions smaller than 10 mm with defined edges, and the presence of calcifications were predictors of false-positive mammograms results. Finally, we observed that false-positives lead to longer times to diagnosis. These findings are relevant for the planning and management of organized breast cancer screening programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.