Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39924539›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Incorporating health literacy principles into the adaptation of a methods motivational interviewing approach for enrolling black adults in a pilot randomized trial.

Olayinka O Shiyanbola, Meng-Jung Wen, Martha A Maurer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olayinka O ShiyanbolaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, MI, USA. yinka@umich.edu.
Meng-Jung WenDivision of Social and Administrative Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, WI, USA.
Martha A MaurerSonderegger Research Center for Improved Medication Outcomes, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suboptimal enrollment and retention efforts can compromise the quality of clinical trials. Barriers to enrolling marginalized populations include low awareness/education about clinical trials. Methods-Motivational Interviewing (MMI) is a patient-centered process that integrates education in providing trial information and engages participants in discussions about the trial before enrollment. Though the MMI approach is effective in enhancing trial recruitment and retention, limited studies have incorporated evidence-based health literacy approaches, especially for underrepresented individuals. In this study, prior to the informed consent process, Black adults completed an interactive orientation followed by a small group discussion. The content used health literacy principles including plain language, infographics, and a pictorial roadmap to guide participants about the purpose of a trial, the randomization process, the study objectives, and timeline. Thereafter, two focus groups explored participants' perceptions of the enrollment process. Fifteen participants attended the orientation with 14 enrolled in the trial after the orientation, (93% enrollment rate). Retention was 93% (control) to 100% (intervention) at the end of 6 months. Participants reported positive orientation experiences due to a better understanding of the study information, expectations, and rationale behind randomization. Implementing an adapted MMI approach focused on health literacy principles may improve trial enrollment and retention rates among Black adults.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanHealth LiteracyMotivational InterviewingPatient SelectionAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsBlack adultsClinical trialsEnrollmentHealth literacyMotivational interviewingRetention

Identifiers

PMID39924539
PMCPMC11808075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.