Trial reportScientific reports2025
Incorporating health literacy principles into the adaptation of a methods motivational interviewing approach for enrolling black adults in a pilot randomized trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Informed Consent in Perinatal Care: Challenges and Best Practices in Obstetric and Midwifery-Led Models.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
- Predicting therapeutic clinical trial enrollment for adult patients with low- and high-grade glioma using supervised machine learning.Science advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suboptimal enrollment and retention efforts can compromise the quality of clinical trials. Barriers to enrolling marginalized populations include low awareness/education about clinical trials. Methods-Motivational Interviewing (MMI) is a patient-centered process that integrates education in providing trial information and engages participants in discussions about the trial before enrollment. Though the MMI approach is effective in enhancing trial recruitment and retention, limited studies have incorporated evidence-based health literacy approaches, especially for underrepresented individuals. In this study, prior to the informed consent process, Black adults completed an interactive orientation followed by a small group discussion. The content used health literacy principles including plain language, infographics, and a pictorial roadmap to guide participants about the purpose of a trial, the randomization process, the study objectives, and timeline. Thereafter, two focus groups explored participants' perceptions of the enrollment process. Fifteen participants attended the orientation with 14 enrolled in the trial after the orientation, (93% enrollment rate). Retention was 93% (control) to 100% (intervention) at the end of 6 months. Participants reported positive orientation experiences due to a better understanding of the study information, expectations, and rationale behind randomization. Implementing an adapted MMI approach focused on health literacy principles may improve trial enrollment and retention rates among Black adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.