ArticleScientific reports2025
Diabetic retinopathy further increases risk of cardiovascular disease mortality in a high-risk cohort.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable retinal deep learning for cardiovascular risk stratification: a multiple modality analysis framework with vascular-centric interpretability and robustness.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Arginyl-Fructosyl-Glucose Derived from Korean Red Ginseng Attenuates Methylglyoxal-Induced Insulin Resistance in HepG2 Cells.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Recent Investigations on Pathogenesis, Biomarkers, Epigenetics, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies to Modulate Multiple Signaling Pathways in Diabetic Retinopathy.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based retinal risk stratification for 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular mortality in patients with hypertension and diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.Clinical hypertension · 2026Article
- Screening and evaluation of therapeutic candidates with vascular protective effects in zebrafish models of diabetic retinopathy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the causal relationship between 16 eye diseases and stroke and their subtypes from a genome-wide perspective.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Relationship between serum cystatin C and diabetic retinopathy in T2DM patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common microvascular complication of diabetes and is strongly linked with systemic vascular comorbidities. This study investigated if DR predicts risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in a high CVD risk cohort. This was a prospective cohort study of 1582 adult participants who presented to a tertiary Australian hospital for evaluation of acute coronary syndrome by coronary angiography. Participants were concurrently examined for DR from mydriatic fundus photographs which were mask-graded according to International Clinical Classification categories of no DR, mild non-proliferative DR, moderate-to-severe NPDR, and proliferative DR. Coronary artery disease was graded from coronary angiograms using the Gensini score. CVD mortality follow-up was assessed 9 years after baseline examination using linkage with the Australian National Death Index. At baseline, 355 (22.4%) participants had any DR. There were 181 (11.4%) fatal CVD events after 9-years follow-up. After controlling for age, sex, BMI, diabetes, total cholesterol, smoking status, hypertension, previous myocardial infarction and stroke, any DR was associated with 1.8-fold higher risk of CVD mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.84, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI: 1.30-2.61]). Mild non-proliferative DR (1.85 [1.26-2.72]) and proliferative DR (5.27 [2.32-12.00]) were associated with greater CVD mortality risk. Further adjustment for coronary artery disease using Gensini scores and excluding patients without diabetes had minimal impact on the association. The increased risk of CVD mortality was significant in both men (2.25 [1.60-3.19]) and women (2.38 [1.24-4.58]) with any DR. In individuals with high CVD risk, presence of DR independently predicts increased CVD mortality. This likely reflects additional contribution of microvascular disease to CVD mortality. Individuals with DR may benefit from a comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment, lifestyle changes, more intensive cardiovascular management and follow-up to minimise risk of death from CVD events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.