Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39924455›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

Beneath the Surface of Self-Reports: Dissecting Subjective and Neural Responses to Age-Specific Visual Stimuli.

Nicola Sambuco, Elise M Stevens, Francesco Versace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicola SambucoDepartment of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8941-1049
Elise M StevensDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Francesco VersaceDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2107-6683

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Neurobehavioral Assessment of Reward Sensitivity in Young SmokersR21DA038001 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI VERSACE, FRANCESCO · 2015 to 2016
$423k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA038001US National Institute of Health (NIH) 10.13039/100000002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study examined how adolescents respond to emotionally arousing images that are considered age-appropriate, such as sports, food, and threatening animals. Prior research in adults has shown a mismatch between subjective arousal ratings and the late positive potential (LPP) for pleasant images, and we aimed to test whether this discrepancy is also present in adolescents. The results showed a larger LPP in response to unpleasant, compared to pleasant, contents. However, comparisons across the different emotional contents showed that the concordance between subjective and neural engagement varies depending on the emotional contents of the scenes. Specifically, images of threatening animals were rated high in emotional arousal and prompted the largest LPP in adolescents, while images of sad people and images of mundane activities were rated lower in emotional arousal and prompted the smallest LPP responses. However, adolescents showed significant divergence in their responses to pleasant images depicting food and sport: despite being rated high in emotional arousal, these images elicited relatively small LPPs. These results highlight the challenges of selecting emotional pictures to assess neuroaffective responses to pleasant and unpleasant pictures in adolescents. To overcome these challenges, future studies may adopt experimental paradigms that will allow researchers to measure neuroaffective responses not just in free-viewing contexts but also during anticipation and reception of actual rewards (and punishments).

Indexed as

ArousalEmotionsEvoked PotentialsVisual PerceptionAdolescentAge FactorsElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationSelf Reportadolescentsemotional arousalLPPpictures

Identifiers

PMID39924455
PMCPMC13435468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.