ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025
Discovery of Novel Pain Regulators Through Integration of Cross-Species High-Throughput Data.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can therapeutic potency of a cancer nanomedicine be predicted by pain-related behavioral test in subcutaneous tumor model?International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Docosahexaenoic Acid Attenuates Visceral Pain by Suppressing Spinal CXCL10/CXCR3/ERK Signaling.Nutrients · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsChronic pain is an impeding condition that affects day-to-day life and poses a substantial economic burden, surpassing many other health conditions. This study employs a cross-species integrated approach to uncover novel pain mediators/regulators.
methodsWe used weighted gene coexpression network analysis to identify pain-enriched gene module. Functional analysis and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis of the module genes were conducted. RNA sequencing compared pain model and control mice. PheWAS was performed to link genes to pain-related GWAS traits. Finally, candidates were prioritized based on node degree, differential expression, GWAS associations, and phenotype correlations.
resultsA gene module significantly over-enriched with the pain reference set was identified (referred to as "pain module"). Analysis revealed 141 pain module genes interacting with 46 pain reference genes in the PPI network, which included 88 differentially expressed genes. PheWAS analysis linked 53 of these genes to pain-related GWAS traits. Expression correlation analysis identified Vdac1, Add2, Syt2, and Syt4 as significantly correlated with pain phenotypes across eight brain regions. NCAM1, VAMP2, SYT2, ADD2, and KCND3 were identified as top pain response/regulator genes.
conclusionThe identified genes and molecular mechanisms may enhance understanding of pain pathways and contribute to better drug target identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.