Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39924174›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025

Real-world outcomes with tisagenlecleucel in aggressive B-cell lymphoma: subgroup analyses from the CIBMTR registry.

Daniel J Landsburg, Matthew J Frigault, Michael Heim, Stephen Ronan Foley, Brian Hill, Grant Schofield, Caron A Jacobson, Samantha Jaglowski, Frederick L Locke, Ron Ram and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. CRS and ICANS in CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Daniel J LandsburgDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA daniel.landsburg@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Matthew J FrigaultDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael HeimCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Stephen Ronan FoleyJuravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Brian HillDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Grant SchofieldDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Caron A JacobsonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Samantha JaglowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Frederick L LockeDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Ron RamBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Peter A RiedellThe David and Etta Jonas Center for Cellular Therapy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Gunjan ShahAdult Bone Marrow Transplant Service and Cellular Therapy Services, Department of Medcicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9977-0456
Leslie L PopplewellDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Ranjan TiwariNovartis Healthcare Pvt Ltd, Hyderabad, India.
Stephen LimNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Marta MajdanNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Aisha MasoodNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Marcelo PasquiniCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Cameron J TurtleFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Consortium for Advancing Management and Prevention of Cancer in People with HIVUM1CA121947 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Joseph A. Sparano · 2015 to 2026
$253.7M
Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network DCC- The Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc.U24HL138660 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Steven M. DeVine, Mehdi Hussain Hamadani · 2017 to 2026
$71.4M
Therapeutic Potential of Adaptive NK Cells in Cancer and TransplantationP01CA111412 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MILLER, JEFFREY S. · 2005 to 2025
$38.2M
Cure Sickle CellOT3HL147741 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI MARY EAPEN, Mary Maresca Horowitz · 2018 to 2026
$37.7M
Hematopopietic Stem Cell TransplantationU01AI069197 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Effie W Petersdorf · 2005 to 2026
$18.9M
Clinical Significance of MHC Haplotypes in Hematopoietic Cell TransplantationR01CA100019 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PETERSDORF, EFFIE W · 2003 to 2025
$9.1M
Immuno-Oncology Translation Network (IOTN): Cellular Immunotherapy Data Resource (CIDR)U24CA233032 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI PASQUINI, MARCELO C. · 2018 to 2019
$9.0M
Randomized study of low versus moderate dose busulfan in transplant for severe combined immunodeficiencyU01AI126612 · NIAID · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI KEAN, LESLIE S, PULSIPHER, MICHAEL A · 2017 to 2023
$8.5M
Immuno and Epigenetics of Hematopoietic Cell TransplantationR01CA218285 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Effie W Petersdorf · 2017 to 2026
$5.6M
The role of TCOF1 in germline predisposition to and in leukemic transformation of chronic myelomonocytic leukemiaR01CA152108 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Jing Zhang · 2011 to 2026
$5.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA111412NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100019NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218285NCI NIH HHS R01 CA231141NCI NIH HHS R01 CA231838NCI NIH HHS R01 CA262899NCI NIH HHS U01 CA083038NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NCI NIH HHS U24 CA233032NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA121947NHLBI NIH HHS OT3 HL147741NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131731NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155741NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL128568NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL138660NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL157560NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI128775NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI150999NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI158861NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069197NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI126612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTisagenlecleucel, a CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, is approved for adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) after ≥2 lines of therapy. When used in real-world settings, tisagenlecleucel has shown similar efficacy and improved safety compared with previous clinical trials. However, long-term data on real-world outcomes are lacking.

methodsClinical data from a cohort of patients treated with tisagenlecleucel in a real-world setting were captured in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. The main clinical outcomes analysed included response rate, duration of response, survival, adverse events and clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics that may affect those outcomes.

resultsAs of May 2022, 1159 patients with R/R DLBCL/HGBCL received tisagenlecleucel. The overall response rate was 59.5%, and the complete response rate was 44.5%. With a median follow-up of 23.2 months in the efficacy set (n=968), the 24 month rates of progression-free survival, ongoing response and overall survival were 28.4%, 52.6% and 43.6%, respectively. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity were reported in 6% and 7.4% of patients, respectively. Patients with DLBCL (vs HGBCL), complete response before infusion, prior autologous or allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) within normal limits experienced more favourable efficacy outcomes, and those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≥2, ≥3 prior lines of therapy, elevated LDH and fludarabine-based lymphodepleting chemotherapy experienced less favourable safety outcomes.

conclusionsThis real-world study of tisagenlecleucel for patients with R/R DLBCL/HGBCL shows consistent efficacy and better safety outcomes than the pivotal trial. This study also identifies baseline disease characteristics and prior or concurrent treatments that may affect clinical outcomes.Tisagenlecleucel, a CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, is approved for adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) after ≥2 lines of therapy. When used in real-world settings, tisagenlecleucel has shown similar efficacy and improved safety compared with previous clinical trials. However, long-term data on real-world outcomes are lacking.Clinical data from a cohort of patients treated with tisagenlecleucel in a real-world setting were captured in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. The main clinical outcomes analysed included response rate, duration of response, survival, adverse events, and clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics that may affect those outcomes.As of May 2022, 1159 patients with R/R DLBCL/HGBCL received tisagenlecleucel. The overall response rate was 59.5%, and the complete response rate was 44.5%. With a median follow-up of 23.2 months in the efficacy set (n=968), the 24 month rates of progression-free survival, ongoing response, and overall survival were 28.4%, 52.6%, and 43.6%, respectively. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity were reported in 6% and 7.4% of patients, respectively. Patients with DLBCL (vs HGBCL), complete response before infusion, prior autologous or allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) within normal limits experienced more favourable efficacy outcomes, and those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, ≥3 prior lines of therapy, elevated LDH, and fludarabine-based lymphodepleting chemotherapy experienced less favourable safety outcomes.In conclusion, this real-world study of tisagenlecleucel for patients with R/R DLBCL/HGBCL shows consistent efficacy and better safety outcomes than the pivotal trial. This study also identifies baseline disease characteristics and prior or concurrent treatments that may affect clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseReceptors, Antigen, T-CellAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultReceptors, Antigen, T-CelltisagenlecleucelB cellChimeric antigen receptor - CARHematologic MalignanciesImmunotherapyLymphoma

Identifiers

PMID39924174
PMCPMC11808862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.