ArticleAcademic pediatrics
Differences in Reporting Suicide Ideation and Attempt: Implications for Suicide Risk Screening in Pediatric Primary Care.
Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePediatricians are uniquely positioned to identify suicide-related risk, yet clinical practices as to when, how, and who gets screened may vary due to differences in policy statements on youth suicide risk screening in primary care. To address these differences, we examined agreement between reports of past suicide ideation (SI) and suicide attempt (SA) across multiple assessment methods and over time. We further explored associations across sociodemographic factors and severity of mental health symptoms on reporting patterns on these methods for adolescents at elevated risk.
methodsAdolescents (N = 162) with SI and/or SA were recruited from multiple clinical sites in and around New York City. Adolescents completed interviews and self-report measures validated to assess suicide-related risk, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms.
resultsAgreement between questions on verbal interviews over time was fair (κ = 0.38), with adolescents under-reporting lifetime SI as time from a crisis went by. Agreement between questions on self-report measures was moderate (κ = 0.51), with adolescents under-reporting past-month SI on a depression screen compared to a suicide-specific screen. Participants with less severe mental health-related symptoms were significantly less likely to report past-month SI consistently.
conclusionsThis study highlights important trends in suicide-related reporting patterns among adolescents at elevated risk for suicide and may have important implications for clinical practice guidelines. To capture more adolescents at risk for suicide, results not only support a universal screening approach using suicide-specific tools but may suggest the need to increase screening frequency in pediatric primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.