ArticleContemporary clinical trials2025
Disease progression trajectory curves to estimate saved time in Alzheimer's disease trials.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Statistical inference for saved time based on disease progression curves in Alzheimer's disease research.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- Penalized estimation of linear transformation models for interval-censored data with time-dependent covariates.Statistical methods in medical research · 2026Article
- Sample size determination for a study with variable follow-up time.Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics · 2025Article
- Comparison between treatment-placebo difference and saved time measures to assess treatment effect in Alzheimer's disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the recent successful disease-modifying therapies against Alzheimer's disease (AD), there have been discussions on easily interpretable measures for treatment effects. Among them, saved time for patients treated with a new drug as compared to patients randomized to the placebo group offers easier interpretation than the reduced percentage in outcome decline at last visit which were commonly used in AD trials. The existing method to calculate saved time utilized the disease progression trajectory of the placebo group and the treatment effect at the last visit. We propose to develop two new methods that use disease progression trajectories of both groups: (1) slope adjusted method; and (2) area under the curve method. We used data from the two donanemab trials and the donepezil trial to illustrate the application of the proposed methods and conducted simulation studies to compare these methods. When a drug has a constant treatment effect over time or early and middle difference in the disease progression, the area under the curve method often has the saved time being longer than the existing method. When the treatment effect is an increasing function of time before the last visit as observed in disease-modifying therapy trials, the slope adjusted method could have a larger saved time as compared to the existing method. In many cases, the area under the curve method often has the smallest standard deviation of saved time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.