ArticleResearch in developmental disabilities2025
Measures of emotional well-being for individuals with intellectual disabilities: A scoping review of reviews.
Article in Research in developmental disabilities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Defining and measuring emotional well-being in intellectual and developmental disabilities: A scoping review.Research in developmental disabilities · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis scoping review of reviews examines how one facet of quality of life, emotional well-being (EWB), has been assessed for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID), including the characteristics of measures that have been designed, adapted, or administered to individuals in this population.
methodsFollowing established practices for scoping reviews, we searched the ERIC, APA Psych Info, and Academic Search Premier databases in November 2022 for review articles that included measures of EWB that had been designed, adapted, or administered to individuals with ID. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted independent double coding at the title and abstract and full text review stages. From each included review article, we extracted the review's purpose, EWB-related construct of interest, and EWB-related measure names and authors. We then located each measure and coded its items using Park et al.'s (2023) definition of EWB. We also coded the "non-EWB" domains assessed by these measures. We used the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Scr) checklist to structure our manuscript.
resultsThe scoping review identified 10 review articles that included 14 unique measures of EWB. Each of these measures included at least 1 item (M = 2.8) that assessed EWB. Quality of life was the most common EWB-related construct specified by review articles. Measures frequently assessed additional constructs beyond EWB, including self-determination, interpersonal relations, physical well-being, and material well-being.
conclusionsIn measures designed or adapted for individuals with ID, EWB is often included as a subcomponent of quality of life. Because of EWB's link to positive social, emotional, behavioral, and health outcomes, research is needed to identify the most salient components of EWB for individuals with ID. This would allow for measures and interventions to be developed to promote EWB in this population. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: This study provides a scoping review of available measures of EWB that have been designed, adapted, or administered to individuals with ID. Study findings detail the characteristics of these measures, highlighting gaps in available EWB measures for children and adolescents with ID. We also found that emotional well-being is frequently assessed as a component of a broader construct (e.g., quality of life) using a small number of items. This suggests a need and opportunity for growth in further understanding emotional well-being assessment in individuals with ID.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.