Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39923246›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2025

Screening for disordered eating in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes: A comparison of Diabetes Eating Problem Survey Revised (DEPS-R) and Youth Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (YEDE-Q) with item-level analysis.

Caroline B Abild, Loa Clausen, Line Wisting, Jens Meldgaard Bruun, Kurt Kristensen, Rene Klinkby Støving, Esben Thyssen Vestergaard

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caroline B AbildSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4725-9880
Loa ClausenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4559-8347
Line WistingRegional Department for Eating Disorders, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5424-7290
Jens Meldgaard BruunSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9937-5467
Kurt KristensenSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3912-8234
Rene Klinkby StøvingCenter for Eating Disorders, Odense University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4255-5544
Esben Thyssen VestergaardSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4263-1815

Funding

Danish Diabetes and Endocrine Academy, Novo Nordisk Foundation NNF17SA0031406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPeople with type 1 diabetes (T1D) face an increased risk of disordered eating (DE) and eating disorders (ED), associated with glucose levels outside target range and an increased risk of complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the type and severity of DE and assess the item accuracy of the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey Revised (DEPS-R) compared to the Youth Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (YEDE-Q) in the screening of DE among adolescents with T1D.

methodsCross-sectional online survey including DEPS-R, YEDE-Q and medical records. Item to total analysis with correlations, and group comparisons were performed.

resultsA total of 131 adolescents between 11 and 19 (mean age 15.3 ± 2.2) years completed both DEPS-R and YEDE-Q, identifying 21.4% and 22.9% with DE, respectively. Significantly more females (>30%) than males (≈5%) were identified in both measures. More than 50% reported insulin restriction in DEPS-R vs. 1.5% in YEDE-Q. YEDE-Q yielded 32% with weight controlling behaviours, however, half of these were unidentified by DEPS-R. Item-total analysis of DEPS-R showed that item 10 had small correlations to both total score and clinical variables.

conclusionThis study confirms the clinical relevance of DEPS-R, including associations between DE and female sex, older age, and glucose levels outside target range, however, it may not accurately capture distinct ED risk behaviours, such as excessive exercise or shape and weight related insulin restriction. The item-total analysis shows that the relevance of item 10 should be further investigated.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Feeding and Eating DisordersAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultadolescenteating disordereating disorder behaviourpediatrictype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID39923246
PMCPMC12006566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.