Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39923234›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2025

Barriers to the use of no and low alcohol products in high-risk drinkers.

Emma L Davies, Parvati Perman-Howe, Jennifer Seddon, Timothy Piatkowski, Cheneal Puljevic, Monica J Barratt, Adam R Winstock, Jason A Ferris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. 'Zero-alcohol' products and the guise of responsibility.Journal of public health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma L DaviesCentre for Psychological Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3577-3276
Parvati Perman-HoweSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2247-4990
Jennifer SeddonCentre for Psychological Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9040-0902
Timothy PiatkowskiSchool of Applied Psychology and Griffith Centre for Mental Health, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6177-0266
Cheneal PuljevicSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3658-9772
Monica J BarrattSocial Equity Research Centre and Digital Ethnography Research Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1015-9379
Adam R WinstockUniversity College London, UK, Global Drug Survey, London, UK.
Jason A FerrisCentre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7474-0173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConsuming no or low (NoLo) alcohol products in place of regular strength alcohol products could reduce alcohol-related harms in high risk drinkers. This study provides a new perspective by exploring beliefs about NoLo products and motives for their use by level of risky drinking using a model of behaviour change.

methodsThe 2022 Global Drug Survey included items on NoLo product use, beliefs, and motives for consuming or not consuming NoLo products. Findings were mapped onto the COM-B (capability-opportunity-motivation) model.

resultsIn a sample of 33,033 respondents (59.5% cis men; 37.3% cis women; 3.2% trans/non-binary) over half (52.2%) reported NoLo product use in the last 12 months. Recent NoLo use was associated with older age, employment status and more common in respondents who drank alcohol compared to non-drinkers. High-risk drinkers were more likely to believe NoLo products could help them to drink less and to avoid embarrassment. However, higher risk drinkers who had never consumed NoLo products were more likely to report that they drank to be intoxicated and believed they would not have a good time if they switched. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsPeople who are drinking for enhancement motives (e.g., for fun, to feel intoxicated) may be less amenable to substituting regular strength alcohol products for NoLo products. NoLo use may help some higher risk drinkers consume less alcohol, and social and motivational factors could be targeted to increase their use. There should be renewed focus on broader intervention strategies, such as creating viable social alternatives to consuming alcohol.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesRisk-TakingAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationYoung Adultalcohol freebarriersCOM‐Bhigh risk drinkerlow alcohol

Identifiers

PMID39923234
PMCPMC11886542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.