ArticleJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
Subject-Based Transfer Learning in Longitudinal Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation.
Article in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pseudo-RGB Slice Stacking in 2D ResUNet for High-Sensitivity Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeAccurate and consistent lesion segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging is required for longitudinal multiple sclerosis (MS) data analysis. In this work, we propose two new transfer learning-based pipelines to improve segmentation performance for subjects in longitudinal MS datasets.
methodIn general, transfer learning is used to improve deep learning model performance for the unseen dataset by fine-tuning a pretrained model with a limited number of labeled scans from the unseen dataset. The proposed methodologies fine-tune the deep learning model for each subject using the first scan and improve segmentation performance for later scans for the same subject. We also investigated the statistical benefits of the proposed methodology by modeling lesion volume over time between progressors according to confirmed disability progression and nonprogressors for a large in-house dataset (937 MS patients, 3210 scans) using a linear mixed effect (LME) model.
resultsThe results show statistically significant improvement for the proposed methodology compared with the traditional transfer learning method using Dice (improvement: 2%), sensitivity (6%), and average volumetric difference (16%), as well as visual analysis for public and in-house datasets. The LME result showed that the proposed subject-wise transfer learning method had increased statistical power for the measurement of longitudinal lesion volume.
conclusionThe proposed method improved lesion segmentation performance and can reduce manual effort to correct the automatic segmentations for final data analysis in longitudinal studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.