Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39923129›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Effects of Bacillus subtilis ATCC PTA-122264 on apparent total tract macronutrient digestibility and fecal characteristics, metabolites, and microbiota of healthy adult dogs.

Patrícia M Oba, Olivia R Swanson, Yifei Kang, Julio C Mioto, John F Menton, Elena Vinay, Mathieu Millette, Melissa R Kelly, Kelly S Swanson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dietary Supplementation withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Evaluation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Patrícia M ObaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2473-1791
Olivia R SwansonDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Yifei KangRoy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Julio C MiotoDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2167-7358
John F MentonKerry Group, Beloit, WI 53511, USA.
Elena VinayKerry Group, Beloit, WI 53511, USA.
Mathieu MilletteKerry (Canada), Laval, Quebec H7V 4B3, Canada.
Melissa R KellyScience Made Simple, LLC, Winston Salem, NC 27101, USA.
Kelly S SwansonDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5518-3076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal and stool quality issues are common in companion animals. In addition to dietary fibers and prebiotics, the consumption of live microorganisms may be used to support the gastrointestinal health of pets. Spore-forming Bacillus species are gaining interest due to their viability during processing, storage, and within the gastrointestinal tract. The objective of the current study was to determine the effects of B. subtilis ATCC PTA-122264 supplementation on dietary apparent total tract macronutrient digestibility and the fecal characteristics, metabolites, and microbiota of healthy adult dogs. Twelve healthy adult beagle dogs (6 ± 1.14 yr; 8.71 ± 0.91 kg body weight) were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design. Dogs were fed to maintain body weight and allotted to 1 of the 3 treatments each experimental period (n = 12/treatment): Control [kibble diet + placebo (1.25 g of maltodextrin)], Low [kibble diet + 1 × 109 colony-forming units (CFU)/d of B. subtilis], and High (kibble diet + 5 × 109 CFU/d of B. subtilis). Each experimental period was composed of a 22-d adaptation phase, 5-d fecal collection phase, and 1 d for blood collection. Fecal microbiota data were evaluated using QIIME2. All other data were analyzed using the Mixed Models procedure of SAS, with P < 0.05 being considered significant. B. subtilis supplementation tended to decrease (P < 0.10) apparent total tract dry matter, organic matter, and energy digestibilities but did not influence food or energy intake, fecal output, and apparent total tract protein or fat digestibilities. Most serum metabolites, hematology, fecal characteristics, and fecal bacterial alpha and beta diversity indices were not affected. Fecal dysbiosis index tended to be affected and fecal Streptococcus, Escherichia coli, and Blautia abundances were lower (P < 0.05) in dogs allotted to the Low treatment. These data suggest that daily supplementation of up to 5 × 109 CFU/d of B. subtilis ATCC PTA-122264 is safe and does not affect markers of general health and fecal characteristics of healthy dogs, warranting further exploration.

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisDigestionFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeNutrientsProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDogsFemaleMaleNutrientscanine healthcanine nutritionprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID39923129
PMCPMC11926536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.