Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39923113›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurodegeneration2025

The transcription factor combination MEF2 and KLF7 promotes axonal sprouting in the injured spinal cord with functional improvement and regeneration-associated gene expression.

Callan L Attwell, Inés Maldonado-Lasunción, Ruben Eggers, Bastiaan A Bijleveld, Ward M Ellenbroek, Natascha Siersema, Lotte Razenberg, Dédé Lamme, Nitish D Fagoe, Ronald E van Kesteren and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epigenetic Signatures of Social Defeat Stress Varying Duration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Callan L AttwellLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, An Institute of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Inés Maldonado-LasunciónLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, An Institute of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ruben EggersLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, An Institute of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bastiaan A BijleveldLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, An Institute of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ward M EllenbroekLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, An Institute of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Natascha SiersemaLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, An Institute of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lotte RazenbergLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, An Institute of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dédé LammeLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, An Institute of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nitish D FagoeLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, An Institute of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ronald E van KesterenDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognition Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
August B SmitDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognition Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Joost VerhaagenLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, An Institute of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Matthew R J MasonLaboratory for Regeneration of Sensorimotor Systems, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, An Institute of the Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. m.mason@nin.knaw.nl.

Funding

ERA-NET NEURON AxonRepairSpinal Research STR111ZonMw 91211043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAxon regeneration after injury to the central nervous system (CNS) is limited by an inhibitory environment but also because injured neurons fail to initiate expression of regeneration associated genes (RAGs). The potential of strong RAG expression to promote regeneration in the CNS is exemplified by the conditioning lesion model, whereby peripheral nerve injury promotes regeneration of centrally projecting branches of the injured neurons. RAG expression could potentially be induced by delivery of the right set of transcription factors (TFs). We here aim to identify TF combinations that activate this program.

methodsWe first analysed binding site motifs in promoters of the RAG program to identify nine candidate growth-promoting TFs. These were systematically screened in vitro to identify combinations that had potent neurite-growth promoting activity. Next, adeno-associated viral vectors were used to express these TF combinations in vivo in L4/L5 dorsal root ganglia to test whether they would promote regeneration in a spinal cord injury model (dorsal column lesion) in female rats. To determine whether they could activate the RAG program we carried out gene expression profiling on laser-dissected dorsal root ganglion neurons specifically expressing these TF combinations, and of DRG neurons that had been axotomized.

resultsPromoter analysis identified ATF3, Jun, CEBPD, KLF7, MEF2, SMAD1, SOX11, STAT3 and SRF as candidate RAG-activating TFs. In vitro screening identified two TF combinations, KLF7/MEF2 and ATF3/KLF7/MEF2, that had potent neurite-growth promoting activity, the latter being the more powerful. In vivo, KLF7/MEF2, but not ATF3/KLF7/MEF2 or KLF7 or MEF2 alone, promoted axonal sprouting into the dorsal column lesion site and led to improved functional recovery. Gene expression profiling revealed that unexpectedly, the MEF2-VP16 construct used had little transcriptional activity in vivo, suggesting additional steps may be required to achieve full MEF2 activity. All combinations except MEF2 alone induced RAG expression mirroring that induced by axotomy to significant extents, while ATF3/KLF7/MEF2, KLF7 and ATF3, but not KLF7/MEF2 also induced apoptosis-related genes which may hinder regeneration.

conclusionsThe TF combination KLF7/MEF2 partially mimics the conditioning lesion effect, inducing axonal sprouting into a dorsal column lesion and driving significant RAG expression, and also promotes functional improvement.

Indexed as

AxonsKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMEF2 Transcription FactorsNerve RegenerationSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsFemaleGanglia, SpinalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecovery of FunctionKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMEF2 Transcription FactorsAAVAxon regenerationGene expression profilingNeuron-intrinsicPromoter analysisSpinal cord injuryTranscription factor combinationsTranscription factor over-expression

Identifiers

PMID39923113
PMCPMC11807332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.