Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39923111›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2025

Limited transmission of avian influenza viruses, avulaviruses, coronaviruses and Chlamydia sp. at the interface between wild birds and a free-range duck farm.

Chloé Le Gall-Ladevèze, Benjamin Vollot, Julien Hirschinger, Laëtitia Lèbre, Rachid Aaziz, Karine Laroucau, Jean-Luc Guérin, Mathilde Paul, Julien Cappelle, Guillaume Le Loc'h

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Cats as sentinels of mammal exposure to H5Nx avian influenza viruses: a seroprevalence study, France, December 2023 to January 2025.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chloé Le Gall-LadevèzeIHAP, ENVT, INRAE, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Benjamin VollotBV Nat, Aigues-Vives, France.
Julien HirschingerIHAP, ENVT, INRAE, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Laëtitia LèbreIHAP, ENVT, INRAE, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Rachid AazizBacterial Zoonoses Unit, Animal Health Laboratory, University Paris-Est, Anses, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Karine LaroucauBacterial Zoonoses Unit, Animal Health Laboratory, University Paris-Est, Anses, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Jean-Luc GuérinIHAP, ENVT, INRAE, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Mathilde PaulIHAP, ENVT, INRAE, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Julien CappelleASTRE, CIRAD, INRAE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Guillaume Le Loc'hIHAP, ENVT, INRAE, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France. guillaume.leloch@envt.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9621-8474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Europe have raised questions regarding the epidemiological role of commensal wild birds on free-range poultry farms. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of avian influenza viruses (AIV), avulaviruses, coronaviruses and Chlamydia sp. in commensal wild birds on a free-range duck farm in southwestern France and to evaluate possible transmission events at the wild‒domestic interface. From 2019 through 2021, a longitudinal study was conducted on wild birds, domestic ducks and their shared environment on farms. Commensal wild birds were captured and sampled for blood and swabs, and fresh feces from cattle egrets visiting the farm were collected. In parallel, domestic ducks were sampled, and environmental samples were collected. The presence of the four pathogens was tested by q(RT-)PCR, and the immunity of wild birds to AIV and Newcastle disease virus (NDV) was tested by ELISA. Wild birds were found to shed AIV and Chlamydia only, with a low prevalence (< 3%). The seroprevalence rates were less than 10% for AIV and less than 4.5% for NDV. No significant temporal trend was identified. Ducks and their environment frequently test simultaneously positive for the same pathogens (19 to 44% of flocks), mostly during fall‒winter. In addition to unrelated temporal patterns, the identification of pathogens in wild birds seemed unrelated to that in domestic ducks. These results suggest a low transmissibility of the avian pathogens tested in our study at the wild‒domestic interface and highlight the limited contribution of commensal wild birds in comparison with free-range poultry to the global microbiological pressure on the environment.

Indexed as

Bird DiseasesChlamydia InfectionsCoronavirus InfectionsDucksInfluenza in BirdsPoultry DiseasesAnimalsAnimals, WildBirdsChlamydiaCoronavirusFarmsFranceInfluenza A virusLongitudinal StudiesPrevalenceAIVavulavirusChlamydia sp.Commensal birdscoronavirusenvironmentfree-range poultrywild-domestic interface

Identifiers

PMID39923111
PMCPMC11806813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.