Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39923099›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2025

Diagnostic value of the appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Roland E Andersson, Joachim Stark

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07370896 (The Alvarado Score in the Emergency Department of Hospitals in the Meta Department, Colombia. A Cross-sectional Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07370896 completednot on this map

The Alvarado Score in the Emergency Department of Hospitals in the Meta Department, Colombia. A Cross-sectional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Departamental de VillavicencioRan2019 to 2020Enrolled125ConditionsAppendicitis (Diagnosis), Acute Appendicitis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Predictive value of the HALP score in differentiating complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roland E AnderssonDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. roland.andersson@rjl.se.
Joachim StarkFuturum Academy for Health and Care, Jönköping County Council, Futurum Läkarprogrammet Hus D2, Länssjukhuset Ryhov, 551 85, Jönköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical scoring algorithms are cost efficient in patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic properties of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score compared with the Alvarado score.

methodsThe PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were searched for reports on the diagnostic properties of the AIR score from 2008 to July 18, 2024. A meta-analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area and the sensitivity and specificity for all and advanced appendicitis patients was performed. Advanced appendicitis was defined as perforated or gangrenous appendicitis or appendicitis abscess or phlegmon or if described as complicated appendicitis. The risk of bias was estimated via the QUADAS-2 tool. The ROC areas of the AIR score and the Alvarado score were compared.

resultsA total of 26 reports with a total of 15.699 patients were included. The area under the ROC curve for the AIR score was 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.88) for all patients with appendicitis and 0.93 (CI 0.91-0.96) for those with advanced appendicitis, which was greater than the corresponding areas for the Alvarado score (0.79, CI 0.76; 0.81) and 0.88, CI 0.82; 0.95), respectively. At > 4 points, the sensitivity was 0.91 (CI 0.88; 0.94) for all patients with appendicitis and 0.95 (CI 0.94; 0.97) for those with advanced appendicitis. At > 3 points, the sensitivity was 0.95 (0.90; 0.97) for all patients with appendicitis and 0.99 (0.97; 0.99) for those with advanced appendicitis. At > 8 points, the specificity was 0.98 (0.97; 0.99) for all patients with appendicitis and 0.99 (0.97; 0.99) for those with advanced appendicitis. The included studies had a low risk for bias and low heterogeneity.

conclusionThe AIR score has a better diagnostic capacity than the Alvarado score does. The AIR score is a safe and efficient basis for risk-stratified management of patients suspected of having appendicitis.

Indexed as

AppendicitisSeverity of Illness IndexHumansROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityAIR scoreAlvarado scoreAppendicitisDiagnosisRisk stratificationScoring system

Identifiers

PMID39923099
PMCPMC11806527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.